Re: [RFC] [PATCH v2 1/3] scatterlist: Add support to clone scatterlist

[Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>]

Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:04:33AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>> For these "tricky" cases, at the time I created sg_split I had done a tester as
>> well. It's very basic, doesn't cover all the corner cases, is a bit dumb, but
>> you might have a look, and the brain cost you'll pay to adapt it to test what
>> you want will hopefully pay off by the knowledge gained on scatterlist. It is
>> appended at the end of the mail.
>
> Might be worth getting this into the kernel source, under tools/testing
> perhaps?

Maybe so.

I'll try, but I don't trust much my chances of success, given that this tester :
 - should compile and link in $(TOP)/lib/scatterlist.c, as this is where
   sg_split() is defined
 - this implies all its includes
 - this implies at least these ones :
	bug.h
	mm.h
	scatterlist.h
	string.h
	types.h
 - this implies having page_to_phys and co. defined somewhere without
   draining the whole include/linux and include/asm* trees

For the tester, I had created an apart include/linux tree where all the includes
were _manually_ filled in with minimal content.

I don't know if an existing selftest had already this kind of problem,
ie. having to compile and link a kernel .c file, and that makes me feel this
might be difficult to keep a nice standalone tester.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html