From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
Cc: <broonie@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<pratyush@kernel.org>, <mwalle@kernel.org>,
<takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <praneeth@ti.com>,
<sebin.francis@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>, <a-dutta@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 16/18] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal controller operating point before dirmap creation
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:25:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wlt1yof3.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8733vp0yuv.fsf@bootlin.com> (Miquel Raynal's message of "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:23:36 +0200")
On 04/09/2026 at 18:23:36 +02, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hello Santhosh,
>
>> +static bool spinand_try_ranked_variant(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>> + struct spi_mem *mem,
>> + enum spinand_bus_interface iface,
>> + u32 *tried_mask)
>> +{
>> + const struct spinand_op_variants *variants = spinand->all_read_variants;
>> + struct spinand_mem_ops *templates = iface == ODTR ?
>> + &spinand->odtr_op_templates : &spinand->ssdr_op_templates;
>> + const struct spi_mem_op *best;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!variants)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + while ((best = spinand_op_find_best_variant(spinand, variants, iface,
>> + *tried_mask, NULL))) {
>> + *tried_mask |= BIT(best - variants->ops);
>> + spinand->max_read_op = *best;
>> + spinand->max_read_op.max_freq = 0;
>> + spinand->max_write_op.max_freq = 0;
>> + ret = spi_mem_execute_tuning(mem, &spinand->max_read_op,
>> + &spinand->max_write_op);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + dev_dbg(&mem->spi->dev, "%s optimization failed: %d\n",
>> + iface == ODTR ? "ODTR" : "SSDR", ret);
>> + if (!ret && spinand->max_read_op.max_freq) {
>> + templates->read_cache = best;
>> + if (spinand->all_cont_read_variants) {
>> + templates->cont_read_cache =
>> + spinand_find_cont_read_variant(spinand, best, iface);
>> + spinand->cont_read_possible =
>> + !!templates->cont_read_cache;
>
> I believe you almost addressed the concerns raised in v7 about
> cont_read_possible, except what you do here is still a bit dangerous
> since you could re-enable continuous reads on no_cs_assertion capable
> controllers. I believe you should clear the flag only, never risk to set
> it, something like:
cf. Sashiko's: [High] Unconditional overwrite of `spinand->cont_read_possible`
bypasses system capability checks, risking unsupported continuous reads.
>
> if (!templates->cont_read_cache)
> spinand->cont_read_possible = false;
>
> With this fixed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
>
> I believe I will take this patch only after Mark takes the batch before,
> which looks mostly good for my non-spi-expert eyes. Either Mark shares
> an immutable tag, or I wait one cycle.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 17:17 [PATCH v9 00/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-phy-pattern-partition property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] spi: parse spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz into post_config_max_speed_hz Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] spi: spi-mem: add execute_tuning callback and spi_mem_execute_tuning() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: move cqspi_readdata_capture earlier Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add DQS support to read data capture Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-26 21:43 ` Mark Brown
2026-09-02 9:45 ` Santhosh Kumar K
2026-09-03 8:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: skip DDR PHY tuning for 2-byte-address ops (i2383) Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: refactor direct read path for PHY support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram CS timing on every chip-select switch Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] mtd: spinand: extract variant ranking logic into spinand_op_find_best_variant() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal controller operating point before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-09-04 16:23 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-04 16:25 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] mtd: spi-nor: extract read op template construction into helper Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] mtd: spi-nor: run controller optimization before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wlt1yof3.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=a-dutta@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=praneeth@ti.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=sebin.francis@ti.com \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox