From: Adrian Fiergolski <Adrian.Fiergolski-vJEk5272eHo@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
<mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Add spi-bits-per-word binding.
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:25:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <983e943b-30f2-7d80-294a-df29bca11738@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170221190830.xyubgimyc2w5p5v6-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
Hi Mark,
I think, we misunderstand. Any line of spidev (or device driver in
general) is called, if master, setting its bit_per_word_mask, doesn't
cover 8 bits per word. Thus, in such a case, any device driver has a
possibility to be registered and handle the "limited capabilities of the
controller". IMHO, the problem is in the spi core itself. I will try to
be more clear.
In my case, xilinx_spi_probe function (of spi-xilinx controller) sets
bits_per_word_mask of spi_master struct only to 16 bits support. Later,
xilinx_spi_probe calls of_register_spi_devices, which calls
of_register_spi_devices. The last one allocates an empty spi_device
struct and configures different options of the spi_device according to a
device tree. bits_per_word are not covered here (why?), thus it is left
0 (value after allocation), which, by convention, means 8 bits support.
At the end, the same function (of_register_spi_device) calls
spi_add_device which finally calls spi_setup. The last call, according
to convention, changes bits_per_word to 8 and calls
__spi_validate_bits_per_word which fails, as master doesn't support 8
bit transmission. This fails registration sequence of a device driver.
As you see, the device driver doesn't have possibility to modify
bits_per_word during the registration process, thus it can't provide
support for such limited controllers.
Regards,
Adrian
On 21.02.2017 at 20:08, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:35:12PM +0100, Adrian Fiergolski wrote:
>> If an SPI controller doesn't support 8 bit transfers
>> (master->bits_per_word_mask), it will be never registered (tested with
>> spidev):
>> of_register_spi_device calls spi_add_device which calls spi_setup. The last
>> takes as an argument spi_device struct, which, in case of spidev, has
>> bits_per_word set to 0. Thus, the spi_setup function will set it to default
>> 8. Further, the same function will call __spi_validate_bits_per_word which
>> will fail the whole registration for controllers not supporting 8 bit
>> transfers (i.e. xilinx-spi).
> This doens't make much sense, if a device driver requires a given number
> of bits per word forcing a different value via device tree is not going
> to result in the driver actually working. If you want to use a device
> with a controller with restricted bits per word support you need to
> change the device driver to support the limited capabilities of the
> controller.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170217101151.hyzmz5a4lgdy7p5m>
2017-02-20 15:35 ` [PATCH] spi: Add spi-bits-per-word binding Adrian Fiergolski
2017-02-21 19:08 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20170221190830.xyubgimyc2w5p5v6-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 17:25 ` Adrian Fiergolski [this message]
[not found] ` <983e943b-30f2-7d80-294a-df29bca11738-vJEk5272eHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 17:55 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20170313175504.mpwjxqbhc4yxk434-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 18:12 ` Adrian Fiergolski
[not found] ` <12c66ecf-8472-c108-d2b4-1d6c3a8e6e74-vJEk5272eHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 19:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdVLUrFnTY+swpxd0yUZ3iMR0_Wi1Dn05NQpYc_4=rA19Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 20:26 ` Adrian Fiergolski
2017-03-17 21:21 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=983e943b-30f2-7d80-294a-df29bca11738@cern.ch \
--to=adrian.fiergolski-vjek5272eho@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).