Re: [PATCH 0/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Target mode improvements

[James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>]

On 30/06/2025 12:40 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:32:37 +0100, James Clark wrote:
>> Improve usability of target mode by reporting FIFO errors and increasing
>> the buffer size when DMA is used. While we're touching DMA stuff also
>> switch to non-coherent memory, although this is unrelated to target
>> mode.
>>
>> The first commit is marked as a fix because it can fix intermittent
>> issues with existing transfers, rather than the later fixes which
>> improve larger than FIFO target mode transfers which would have never
>> worked.
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Clear completion counter before initiating transfer
>        commit: fa60c094c19b97e103d653f528f8d9c178b6a5f5
> [2/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use non-coherent memory for DMA
>        (no commit info)
> [3/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Increase DMA buffer size
>        (no commit info)
> [4/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Report FIFO overflows as errors
>        (no commit info)
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 

Hi Mark,

Not sure if this is a mistake in the notification or not, but this one 
shouldn't be applied. There is a v4 with some issues. Although the 
notification on V4 that patch 1 was applied is OK.

Thanks
James