From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
To: Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@samsung.com>
Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, sbkim73@samsung.com,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] SPI: SAMSUNG: Bug fix for SPI with different FIFO level
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:38:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=L7QeN75ebWFXdp_V5Pw1zEc-ZtA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309437536-9315-2-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@samsung.com> wrote:
> Fixed the bug in transmission status check for 64 bytes FIFO
> level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c
> index 795828b..8945e20 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c
> @@ -116,9 +116,7 @@
> (((i)->fifo_lvl_mask + 1))) \
> ? 1 : 0)
>
> -#define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_DONE(v, i) ((((v) >> (i)->rx_lvl_offset) & \
> - (((i)->fifo_lvl_mask + 1) << 1)) \
> - ? 1 : 0)
> +#define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_DONE(v, i) (((v) & (1 << (i)->tx_st_done)) ? 1 : 0)
IIRC the macro is already designed to deduct tx-done levels from other fields.
Could you please _explain_ with one example where it fails ? It is
difficult to see without
numbers.
Thanks,
-Jassi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 12:38 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Added tx_st_done variable in the platform data of SPI Padmavathi Venna
2011-06-30 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] SPI: SAMSUNG: Bug fix for SPI with different FIFO level Padmavathi Venna
2011-06-30 7:08 ` Jassi Brar [this message]
2011-06-30 9:05 ` padma venkat
2011-06-30 9:52 ` Jassi Brar
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=9c5asfr=Jg6xwjQZW_a369UO64Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-30 11:00 ` Tony Nadackal
2011-07-01 5:46 ` padma venkat
2011-07-01 5:52 ` Jassi Brar
2011-07-01 5:59 ` padma venkat
2011-07-01 6:13 ` Jassi Brar
2011-07-04 6:55 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 6:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 9:54 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-04 10:04 ` padma venkat
2011-07-04 10:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-04 15:06 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 5:51 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-06 6:22 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-06 6:30 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-06 7:17 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-07-06 17:30 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=L7QeN75ebWFXdp_V5Pw1zEc-ZtA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=padma.v@samsung.com \
--cc=sbkim73@samsung.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).