Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: Allow SPI devices to specify that they are timing sensitive

[Guenter Roeck <groeck-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

From: Douglas Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, May 10, 2019 at 3:35 PM
To: Mark Brown, Benson Leung, Enric Balletbo i Serra
Cc: <linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>, <drinkcat-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Guenter Roeck, <briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>, <mka-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>, Douglas
Anderson, <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, <linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>

> If a device on the SPI bus is very sensitive to timing then it may be
> necessary (for correctness) not to get interrupted during a transfer.
> One example is the EC (Embedded Controller) on Chromebooks.  The
> Chrome OS EC will drop a transfer if more than ~8ms passes between the
> chip select being asserted and the transfer finishing.
>
> The SPI framework already has code to handle the case where transfers
> are timing senstive.  It can set its message pumping thread to
> realtime to to minimize interruptions during the transfer.  However,
> at the moment, this mode can only be requested by a SPI controller.
> Let's allow the drivers for SPI devices to also request this mode.
>
> NOTE: at the moment if a given device on a bus says that it's timing
> sensitive then we'll pump all messages on that bus at high priority.
> It is possible we might want to relax this in the future but it seems
> like it should be fine for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>

Nitpick: I would use 'rt' instead of 'timing_sensitive' as name for the
new variable.

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>
>  drivers/spi/spi.c       | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/linux/spi/spi.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index 0597f7086de3..d117ab3adafa 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -1367,10 +1367,30 @@ static void spi_pump_messages(struct kthread_work *work)
>         __spi_pump_messages(ctlr, true);
>  }
>
> -static int spi_init_queue(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
> +/**
> + * spi_boost_thread_priority - set the controller to pump at realtime priority
> + * @ctlr: controller to boost priority of
> + *
> + * This can be called because the controller requested realtime priority
> + * (by setting the ->rt value before calling spi_register_controller()) or
> + * because a device on the bus said that its transfers were timing senstive.
> + *
> + * NOTE: at the moment if any device on a bus says it is timing sensitive then
> + * all the devices on this bus will do transfers at realtime priority.  If
> + * this eventually becomes a problem we may see if we can find a way to boost
> + * the priority only temporarily during relevant transfers.
> + */
> +static void spi_boost_thread_priority(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
>  {
>         struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 };
>
> +       dev_info(&ctlr->dev,
> +               "will run message pump with realtime priority\n");
> +       sched_setscheduler(ctlr->kworker_task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
> +}
> +
> +static int spi_init_queue(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
> +{
>         ctlr->running = false;
>         ctlr->busy = false;
>
> @@ -1390,11 +1410,8 @@ static int spi_init_queue(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
>          * request and the scheduling of the message pump thread. Without this
>          * setting the message pump thread will remain at default priority.
>          */
> -       if (ctlr->rt) {
> -               dev_info(&ctlr->dev,
> -                       "will run message pump with realtime priority\n");
> -               sched_setscheduler(ctlr->kworker_task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
> -       }
> +       if (ctlr->rt)
> +               spi_boost_thread_priority(ctlr);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2985,6 +3002,11 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>
>         spi_set_cs(spi, false);
>
> +       if (spi->timing_sensitive && !spi->controller->rt) {
> +               spi->controller->rt = true;
> +               spi_boost_thread_priority(spi->controller);
> +       }
> +
>         dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "setup mode %d, %s%s%s%s%u bits/w, %u Hz max --> %d\n",
>                         (int) (spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA)),
>                         (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH) ? "cs_high, " : "",
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> index 053abd22ad31..ef6bdd4d25f2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> @@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ void spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(struct spi_statistics *stats,
>   *     This may be changed by the device's driver, or left at the
>   *     default (0) indicating protocol words are eight bit bytes.
>   *     The spi_transfer.bits_per_word can override this for each transfer.
> + * @timing_sensitive: Transfers for this device are senstive to timing
> + *     so we should do our transfer at high priority.
>   * @irq: Negative, or the number passed to request_irq() to receive
>   *     interrupts from this device.
>   * @controller_state: Controller's runtime state
> @@ -143,6 +145,7 @@ struct spi_device {
>         u32                     max_speed_hz;
>         u8                      chip_select;
>         u8                      bits_per_word;
> +       bool                    timing_sensitive;
>         u32                     mode;
>  #define        SPI_CPHA        0x01                    /* clock phase */
>  #define        SPI_CPOL        0x02                    /* clock polarity */
> --
> 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog
>