From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com, chin-ting_kuo@aspeedtech.com,
clg@kaod.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@aj.id.au,
kdasu.kdev@gmail.com, han.xu@nxp.com, john.garry@huawei.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, avifishman70@gmail.com,
tmaimon77@gmail.com, tali.perry1@gmail.com, venture@google.com,
yuenn@google.com, benjaminfair@google.com, haibo.chen@nxp.com,
yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com, heiko@sntech.de,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
michal.simek@xilinx.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Replace `dummy.nbytes` with `dummy.ncycles`
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 22:19:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVJ_UtGqOm_HsN4X4nAuy9svXe4XV6aeG_fg8cWDrgrHMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf57f3aafc3e0a02c81dab905ce9497e@walle.cc>
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 10:04 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>
> Am 2023-03-09 14:54, schrieb Tudor Ambarus:
> > On 09.03.2023 15:33, Michael Walle wrote:
> >>>>> The controllers that can talk in dummy ncycles don't need the
> >>>>> dummy.{buswidth, dtr} fields.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The controllers that can't talk in dummy cycles, but only on a
> >>>>> "byte"
> >>>>> boundary need both buswidth and dtr fields. Assume a flash needs 32
> >>>>> dummy cycles for an op on 8D-8D-8D mode. If the controller does not
> >>>>> have
> >>>>> the buswidth and dtr info, it can't convert the dummy ncycles to
> >>>>> nbytes.
> >>>>> If he knows only that buswidth is 8, it will convert ncycles to 4
> >>>>> bytes.
> >>>>> If dtr is also specified it converts ncycles to 2 bytes.
> >>>>
> >>>> No they don't need it. Lets take your semper flash and assume it
> >>>> needs
> >>>> 12 latency cycles. SPI-NOR will set ncycles to 12 *regardless of the
> >>>> mode
> >>>> or dtr setting*. The controller then knows we need 12 clock cycles.
> >>>> It has
> >>>> then to figure out how that can be achieved. E.g. if it can only do
> >>>> the
> >>>> "old" byte programming and is in quad mode, good for it. It will
> >>>> send 6
> >>>> dummy bytes, which will result in 12 dummy clock cycles, because 1
> >>>> byte
> >>>> takes two clock cycles in quad SDR mode. If its in octal mode, send
> >>>> 12
> >>>> bytes. If its in dual mode, send 3 bytes. Obiously, it cannot be in
> >>>> single bit mode, because it cannot send 1.5 bytes..
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> You miss the fact that you can have 1-1-4. What buswidth do you use
> >>> for dummy, the address buswidth or the data buswidth?
> >>
> >> Doesn't matter, does it? The driver is free to chose, 1, 4, or
> >> anything
> >> else. You don't sample any data during the dummy phase.
> >> To answer your question: single for instruction, single for address,
> >> whatever you choose for dummy as long as there are ncycles space
> >> between
> >> address and data, and quad for data.
> >
> > Huh? How does the controller chose, based on what?
>
> Based on its own capabilities. It can choose either way. In the end
> what matters is how many clock cycles there are between the address
> and data phase. And you only need to convey that information to the
> SPI controller - your new ncycles.
It does matter. Controller may be designed to actively drive
MOSI/WP/HOLD during single-spi dummy cycles and WP/HOLD
during dual-spi dummy cycles. If the pin modes between the
controller and device mismatched, worst case scenario
the chip may get fried.
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-11 17:45 [PATCH] spi: Replace `dummy.nbytes` with `dummy.ncycles` Sergiu Moga
2022-09-12 9:44 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2022-09-12 10:58 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-09-12 11:52 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-25 22:03 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-26 9:05 ` Sergiu.Moga
2022-09-26 17:24 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-27 8:21 ` Sergiu.Moga
2023-03-08 9:04 ` Tudor Ambarus
2023-03-09 8:38 ` Michael Walle
2023-03-09 10:42 ` Tudor Ambarus
2023-03-09 10:56 ` Michael Walle
2023-03-09 12:09 ` Tudor Ambarus
2023-03-09 12:35 ` Michael Walle
2023-03-09 13:23 ` Tudor Ambarus
2023-03-09 13:33 ` Michael Walle
2023-03-09 13:54 ` Tudor Ambarus
2023-03-09 14:01 ` Michael Walle
2023-03-09 14:19 ` Chuanhong Guo [this message]
2023-03-09 15:41 ` Michael Walle
2023-03-09 15:41 ` Tudor Ambarus
2023-03-04 5:59 ` Tudor Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJsYDVJ_UtGqOm_HsN4X4nAuy9svXe4XV6aeG_fg8cWDrgrHMQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gch981213@gmail.com \
--cc=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=avifishman70@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=benjaminfair@google.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chin-ting_kuo@aspeedtech.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tali.perry1@gmail.com \
--cc=tmaimon77@gmail.com \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=venture@google.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com \
--cc=yuenn@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).