From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-189.mta1.migadu.com (out-189.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C942A16CD22 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.189 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724079097; cv=none; b=U3o3cjJnUNNr5ns7tAHpTWEWogtKhZMBYPgosAj0JLPuLwVudQtBfb74R3aUcOR8DEUfxDErQaqmP/qKGr3DqxAigONrr7uD4xC3YslXCByGEthWR5SYvYpcwR2PWCx9Bus7YcaL5rVOVJN+3MUAD9YAbJwvdqDq/1WUdL73BZw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724079097; c=relaxed/simple; bh=anC9TSfJ9atzD1KEU7o2hISDrSWZyCtUZv3frTZMXYA=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=lc6bFbIQoNRrDKZDw18W45Xkkpc4sOixdqCml4KQftYsPzfBWMkNVWgGJFdczD/VhUs2eetZ4F5foYNz3B+6KJbl9jA4sT7E0kasDhwLcD/L+wTwaFdGWZHqT90wC9moXcCOekxASA7cG54LuQ3KU7gQZq8P344Xx+3hVk3m1xk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b=kE/tizXz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b="kE/tizXz" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1724079092; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=anC9TSfJ9atzD1KEU7o2hISDrSWZyCtUZv3frTZMXYA=; b=kE/tizXzU0003+6EVOibXXnk/fULdkZnyJkdCAsb0BEllVv27hciztIMtxAm8rCn+68e31 nAfAJo7rRN5E2o/HS0s4WUWhV6FN5mRxRrXOPC/lIbkTqIgMaHjsB2s0ch+z0r/eOEbe1d jRuP2L2tVqHAMphAvt1uMVOv6RRnBpoTiVk8TyZrdI9efwa9GWUEt7sPcyWQmZ/fCri1Iy 4fRTDTiPUHxUbDlI4KRX38Ca2RuMqvEuQYP3nH0P78Ea/01OEG2irjw11Ybq27XgMpZ8MT Tr3o/48WZeV14Bz+4QpokbDhBT7NMa9u6SBj1UP1IivRbmBF2RfETbCjzTRqdw== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=96437a84d4599b1620474bb25d7caa8cc60be0169b1ebc5c8503e60b90be; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:51:21 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "Huang-Huang Bao" , "Rockchip SoC..." , , "Heiko Stuebner" , "Linus Walleij" , "Sasha Levin" , "linux-arm-kernel" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Mark Brown" Subject: Re: [BUG] Rockchip SPI: Runtime PM usage count underflow! X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: "Vicente Bergas" References: In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT --96437a84d4599b1620474bb25d7caa8cc60be0169b1ebc5c8503e60b90be Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon Aug 19, 2024 at 4:37 PM CEST, Vicente Bergas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:33 PM Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Mon Aug 19, 2024 at 3:14 PM CEST, Vicente Bergas wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:49 PM Vicente Bergas wrote: > > > > Added: > > > > Huang-Huang Bao > > > > Linus Walleij > > > > Sasha Levin > > > > > > > > The first offending commit is: > > > > 29d8101fb9442544077e68e27839a1979f85633d pinctrl: rockchip: fix pinmux > > > > bits for RK3328 GPIO2-B pins > > > > > > > > I've also tested 6.10.6 with it reverted (and > > > > 456447ff1fe3c28e2fd7b57a79650f62245c6428 and > > > > 7127c68c76f120367b9a5053f524df0b603d4a48 as dependencies) and SPI > > > > works fine. > > > > > > Sorry for the noise: > > > reverting only 29d8101fb9442544077e68e27839a1979f85633d makes it work on 6.10.6. > > > Ignore what i said about 456447ff1fe3c28e2fd7b57a79650f62245c6428 and > > > 7127c68c76f120367b9a5053f524df0b603d4a48. > > > > Please try if unreverting that commit and adding the following: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240709105428.1176375-1-i@eh5.me/ > > > > fixes the issue as well. > > I confirm that 6.10.6 without any reverts plus > 20240709105428.1176375-1-i@eh5.me also fixes the issue. It would be great if that patch got accepted to fix the breakage, including on a number of stable kernel versions. --96437a84d4599b1620474bb25d7caa8cc60be0169b1ebc5c8503e60b90be Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZsNb7QAKCRDXblvOeH7b bpLRAP43HO7c7+6ex8WcGcQs/3phh9JuAbc0tAVVI5tGO48g0QEAmeA/twUmoTUL 4Ieigmn/2Uv+eIsvOtIabv01dKjoyAA= =P5nK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --96437a84d4599b1620474bb25d7caa8cc60be0169b1ebc5c8503e60b90be--