From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AEBC6FA8A for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229622AbiILKjN (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 06:39:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37704 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229496AbiILKjL (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 06:39:11 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CAED21241; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 03:39:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1662979151; x=1694515151; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=w3vFwdYLxWsQ9bEvrr+2hHC3zOoyKWcZ+8GtDAo7dCU=; b=FUx8SQDi+VRECKMNKEnrPkpJ8h77lUkDB8/1EhzRLRgCAce1DSqj4Ind BPryJaJGJCURHbm3FycsO0pHttBthL2JYA3Gc3pyWRDDVwFzFM057WQ/0 q5e6cwGM4zx5BpkcOPdjxOeoA9PF0iigpQA+r5z5sc18qGcSg7Yxi+Lvs 02wmm6NEf9vXY/qVbeDUhq6JUtaIxBdRlMjKO2DYAH3LZfb+aLw9OE1B8 xcOSLczz7hBLTMW+a9Akn5SICrseaiOI62IR4CP3zubvMvh3b6Qoh2Ku7 M2uIDcFwt2hl7feJvxAJDH/pr7tI4wMYII6D4GU7+zKl+blDsBia4UnCg g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10467"; a="359558492" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,310,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="359558492" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Sep 2022 03:39:10 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,310,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="719712154" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Sep 2022 03:39:04 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oXgqC-001Irg-2C; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:39:00 +0300 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:39:00 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Hans de Goede , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-efi , linux-i2c , linux-arm-msm , Linux ARM , linux-spi , "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" , Len Brown , Elie Morisse , Nehal Shah , Shyam Sundar S K , Khalil Blaiech , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Robert Moore , Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI: unify _UID handling as integer Message-ID: References: <20220908132910.62122-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 06:32:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: ... > Tentatively applied as 6.1 material. Thanks! > If there are updates, we'll make changes as they go. There is one at least to fix a warning in the perf patch. Should I resend a fixed patch, just a fix, or entire series with a fixed patch? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko