From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3C4267F45; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741875919; cv=none; b=DWJWjmjcYxCAbxiveqoEdutrt/c/IXzAONpuTQQ/hNoB5Wca8UCFIe37K4IEsoGXWRgii+bkEi1c5Wn+7LAsTarGhFiXH6tpt/N/YERf80dlqvmAoBBXwHe28aVuqGu+r9QHZyOwMrsFKnjfZl6piq8CRkb6FZNe0rNjigN/r3s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741875919; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KGmJrceDamjRYmfBqz65BHjaNIf+vVNxlgv1SUPYziw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VCQs+h526PpAJm2SZuuMxvNAwYX0G0MO9ezpH2RdCSVPMbmtop0MX1HTOFsn7/+T9mCHqIwuKqmZ/pyBfANUwoiIshI4ZAItAfoe463HuhTNCAkPs3x+9fw3imCGsfLMgSCJHVvnv4ftn9XAbBJpj1F/E63CHVTv5mjvgUog+rk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nScF/ei3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nScF/ei3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741875918; x=1773411918; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KGmJrceDamjRYmfBqz65BHjaNIf+vVNxlgv1SUPYziw=; b=nScF/ei3BVzw8q1KQ96U3PyfgKia1Ruuoo7g37RjrKD8RhsNXMLYM0S4 FJoU5rdOTGLcxnKb9dY1t60CISoMZt8rlafGnvnKv8mdnU/GchDGoYfyU TDSlsUUKdLQeJiOF9XjE0yAN6TtABfttYP4fD+FNk/sPJo2vXNNR54RkR aiGB6/A412TSDfr38jSybEGdn9Ou7y0IY03CudN6efy+smgC4J7EEi2RG XvBf+cyNLalI9cgy9GmsFAkMXbHpamjomhvhjV0b3AmaCeS5kT3UUGksq 7YqqymUanfXG6zZucSXVAqLeRBHyiAk5T0Iev2WT5mcFJJSoTtR9e5GFd g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9TRemX/tSlWl53iByr9Vhw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1/Mt6bV9R2K1OURd71dcHA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11372"; a="43173763" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,244,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="43173763" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2025 07:25:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: KmOb6IzoQve4rBYyMtpT7Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xwpBqq35QGqpHdkmv4DpIg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,244,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="121470355" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2025 07:25:16 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tsjUn-00000002CZB-1ykw; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:25:13 +0200 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:25:13 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Use inclusive language Message-ID: References: <20250313111442.322850-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1c49edb2-2ffc-419e-be5e-7e15669a7839@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:12:29PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:01:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:47:32PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. > > > Hmm... It's based on the spi/for-next. Should I use another branch? > > I did try to apply it against that in case there were fixes that needed > merging up, it didn't apply. Are you sure you're using an up to date > copy? I have ebd50ac3cd97ecae231f92b2d64b68d3c66b3474. 87a228960033 spi: Use inclusive language 0d9a21198453 defconfig: enable SERIAL_MULTI_INSTANTIATE 90485ebfb4b3 defconfig: enable SPI_TOPCLIFF_PCH 6d91e1fce386 defconfig: enable EEPROM_AT24 and EEPROM_AT25 331ffc354c53 defconfig: enable GPIO_PCH d519315d6bed Merge remote-tracking branch 'spi/for-next' into HEAD ebd50ac3cd97 (spi/for-next) Merge remote-tracking branch 'spi/for-6.15' into spi-next Yes, the base where it was merged to is eds-acpi branch of my public GH [1], which has no SPI stuff in there. [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/linux/commits/eds-acpi/ -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko