public inbox for linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, brgl@bgdev.pl, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	andy@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: cs42l43: Use actual ACPI firmware node for chip selects
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 13:50:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aR8AmhcY_y93O3GM@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120105907.1373797-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>

On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 10:59:07AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On some systems the cs42l43 has amplifiers attached to its SPI
> controller that are not properly defined in ACPI. Currently
> software nodes are added to support this case, however, the chip
> selects for these devices are specified using a hack. A software
> node is added with the same name as the pinctrl driver, as the
> look up was name based, this allowed the GPIO look up to return
> the pinctrl driver even though the swnode was not owned by it.
> This was necessary as the swnodes did not support directly
> linking to real firmware nodes.
> 
> Since commit e5d527be7e69 ("gpio: swnode: don't use the swnode's
> name as the key for GPIO lookup") changed the lookup to be
> fwnode based this hack will no longer find the pinctrl driver,
> resulting in the driver not probing. There is no pinctrl driver
> attached to the swnode itself. But other patches did add support
> for linking a swnode to a real fwnode node [1]. As such the hack
> is no longer needed, so switch over to just passing the real
> fwnode for the pinctrl property to avoid any issues.

...

> +		struct property_entry props[] = {
> +			PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY_LEN("cs-gpios", args, ARRAY_SIZE(args)),

No need to open code PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY().

> +			{ }
> +		};

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-20 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-20 10:59 [PATCH v2] spi: cs42l43: Use actual ACPI firmware node for chip selects Charles Keepax
2025-11-20 11:21 ` Philipp Zabel
2025-11-20 12:27   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-11-20 13:43     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-11-20 11:50 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-11-20 12:42   ` Charles Keepax
2025-11-20 12:48     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-11-21  6:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-21 19:36 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aR8AmhcY_y93O3GM@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox