From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Allow using spi_bitbang_setup() with custom txrx_bufs()
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:47:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30911252247i344f5bf3pb0240b9c23878bf5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40911251415q624f3610n92cbc20437b12bf6@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1761 bytes --]
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This patch modifies the shared spi bitbanging code
>> to allow using spi_bitbang_setup() even though the
>> txrx_word[] callbacks are unset. Useful for drivers
>> that want to make use of spi_bitbang_setup() but
>> have their own txrx_bufs() callback.
>> @@ -196,9 +205,11 @@ int spi_bitbang_setup(struct spi_device
>> }
>>
>> /* per-word shift register access, in hardware or bitbanging */
>> - cs->txrx_word = bitbang->txrx_word[spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL|SPI_CPHA)];
>> - if (!cs->txrx_word)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + if (bitbang->txrx_bufs == spi_bitbang_bufs) {
>> + cs->txrx_word = bitbang->txrx_word[spi->mode & mode_mask];
>> + if (!cs->txrx_word)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Hmmm... this smells like an ugly hack to me. It seems to me that if
> some bitbang backend drivers don't want this code, then it should be
> encoded into a callback so it can be overridden. Thoughts.
Yeah, it's far from clean. I want to make use of spi_bitbang_setup()
in my MSIOF driver, but I want to avoid dummy txtx_word[] callbacks
that will be unused since i'm using a driver specific
bitbang->txrx_bufs function.
I guess the attached patch is slightly cleaner? I like the idea of
letting bitbang drivers use shared code for
spi_bitbang_setup()/spi_bitbang_cleanup() with their private
setup_transfer() function which in turn calls
spi_bitbang_setup_transfer(). My impression is that there's quite a
bit of duplicated setup()/cleanup() code.
/ magnus
[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.6.33-pre-spi-word-mode-setup-20091126.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 3503 bytes --]
From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
---
drivers/spi/spi_bitbang.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/spi/spi_gpio.c | 2 +-
include/linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- 0001/drivers/spi/spi_bitbang.c
+++ work/drivers/spi/spi_bitbang.c 2009-11-26 14:59:53.000000000 +0900
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ int spi_bitbang_setup_transfer(struct sp
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_bitbang_setup_transfer);
/**
- * spi_bitbang_setup - default setup for per-word I/O loops
+ * spi_bitbang_setup - setup function when bitbang->txrx_word[] are unused
*/
int spi_bitbang_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
{
@@ -195,11 +195,6 @@ int spi_bitbang_setup(struct spi_device
spi->controller_state = cs;
}
- /* per-word shift register access, in hardware or bitbanging */
- cs->txrx_word = bitbang->txrx_word[spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL|SPI_CPHA)];
- if (!cs->txrx_word)
- return -EINVAL;
-
retval = bitbang->setup_transfer(spi, NULL);
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
@@ -224,6 +219,32 @@ int spi_bitbang_setup(struct spi_device
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_bitbang_setup);
/**
+ * spi_bitbang_setup_word_mode - default setup for per-word I/O loops
+ */
+int spi_bitbang_setup_word_mode(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+ struct spi_bitbang_cs *cs;
+ struct spi_bitbang *bitbang;
+ void *txrx_word;
+ int retval;
+
+ bitbang = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
+
+ /* per-word shift register access, in hardware or bitbanging */
+ txrx_word = bitbang->txrx_word[spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA)];
+ if (!txrx_word)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ retval = spi_bitbang_setup(spi);
+ if (!retval) {
+ cs = spi->controller_state;
+ cs->txrx_word = txrx_word;
+ }
+ return retval;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_bitbang_setup_word_mode);
+
+/**
* spi_bitbang_cleanup - default cleanup for per-word I/O loops
*/
void spi_bitbang_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
@@ -455,6 +476,8 @@ int spi_bitbang_start(struct spi_bitbang
if (!bitbang->master->transfer)
bitbang->master->transfer = spi_bitbang_transfer;
+
+ /* "word mode" when spi_bitbang_bufs() are used */
if (!bitbang->txrx_bufs) {
bitbang->use_dma = 0;
bitbang->txrx_bufs = spi_bitbang_bufs;
@@ -462,7 +485,7 @@ int spi_bitbang_start(struct spi_bitbang
if (!bitbang->setup_transfer)
bitbang->setup_transfer =
spi_bitbang_setup_transfer;
- bitbang->master->setup = spi_bitbang_setup;
+ bitbang->master->setup = spi_bitbang_setup_word_mode;
bitbang->master->cleanup = spi_bitbang_cleanup;
}
} else if (!bitbang->master->setup)
--- 0001/drivers/spi/spi_gpio.c
+++ work/drivers/spi/spi_gpio.c 2009-11-26 14:53:37.000000000 +0900
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static int spi_gpio_setup(struct spi_dev
}
}
if (!status)
- status = spi_bitbang_setup(spi);
+ status = spi_bitbang_setup_word_mode(spi);
if (status) {
if (!spi->controller_state && cs != SPI_GPIO_NO_CHIPSELECT)
gpio_free(cs);
--- 0001/include/linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h
+++ work/include/linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h 2009-11-26 14:54:08.000000000 +0900
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct spi_bitbang {
* methods, if you like.
*/
extern int spi_bitbang_setup(struct spi_device *spi);
+extern int spi_bitbang_setup_word_mode(struct spi_device *spi);
extern void spi_bitbang_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi);
extern int spi_bitbang_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *m);
extern int spi_bitbang_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-26 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 8:26 [PATCH] spi: Allow using spi_bitbang_setup() with custom txrx_bufs() Magnus Damm
2009-11-25 22:15 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 6:47 ` Magnus Damm [this message]
2009-11-26 7:21 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 7:50 ` Magnus Damm
2009-11-26 14:45 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aec7e5c30911252247i344f5bf3pb0240b9c23878bf5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).