From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B221A2080C1 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762966361; cv=none; b=UAP4z/Upb8Od1nsrV/DyBWh46j8uvJLMGiJp2H7UCPx3jTVJY3p6mh3PGywn/qVIlpE0GdBdkp7oaGh1NxPm9ui0gyE0vDlpk3yASUciT+AzRKg7X2cyjaua5ILuTiecBz4Racrr6EEod0mdNDN2c5Uz98ncLktx/F183D8aYNU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762966361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vquyA6U0yVLVU87ffFxSvxSxY4DbgBQ5yYCH68Wc3l4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nmFq1QHBplCSd1qLuZS5WNbmE+gEGJl2e8dypp55LTAZecKeRA+eafXX+4G5n1kNZa+EqpYsOPMUFpZGZ0YuPytuktswkjPWoirxdKxWpFVWmTEE0LzCh2i6fW0Y2t3ocWkM+56lPqbF5siO5HAYCApi1JfiLlIIzM078lrcFI4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=jO46oGgS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="jO46oGgS" Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7c704bf2d9eso485905a34.0 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:52:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1762966356; x=1763571156; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=otKN6HaBW7TeFZXmhol1N0rafttZcw0ehXIldHQZRQU=; b=jO46oGgS/vM3MXXYczpi4QHmtXP4ZJ6G9q+Sfnq2whfaApDS5crM9wQfMGl7pYGSSF kS5DX/Ko2AXyYeJ1cwm2qjGLv6RlMafrr5J1cXTVxvacrsR6SW2gT6knsOQdYZAO6zSY d9Cgmf99MFjOpBDPnWQ8BW8GwOun1+B8s7WWmDVNjto8kTwxkkntu4+H/CsBP0F/arPK 2Ry3hfnAzVIGT8YeflrPx+6zEc3djCRx3Vonriz2hNiJKY9YXrPjki+5youDgXgRqU+L twTzmcbLFregOVEXAm2a6AA1Vr0EaauKeBWqhA9Z1OTTlndzLeM2pdXl5x8Hz8/KaHQC 9JdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762966356; x=1763571156; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=otKN6HaBW7TeFZXmhol1N0rafttZcw0ehXIldHQZRQU=; b=GD4TvmAVBoCXdWZfpY+Nff9dAsx716v+04rebiOlxwPMkjuPmxbCCr0mGbUe6g9el7 o3NiyEVTDgRH5AKqVqNp3UWZqupOZuga+00Bqu9DMNjSMkid7UUCrmGZq5WjE6hZ2XXP A24HivVLVFh1w7/b+P00BOPH5H4FQr7tdGC2cMFz1RE0Aro7WCkLD+eBbszGdUqJ5NBn 45oQedMbN3o3jv5z59PylDUbShMLr4KS2a3glCMYNpGXXjiUP9Wc/z1CkRohiLkRCQp1 PTR4rHNAB+bYwlfUQpOZ7P3GuZNLzPRfte32aqlkvw5QP96x/c4GHSLOJEJD/8m65BG0 4sJQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU8kaTwMtNdRcC/Fvpe3g4bPxurzUl/Z6JbUVnFmHJDZOIq96HaKDfiEJUq3AXj/ctuW9FavNLh4E0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzKDADjD1p0378juKJBiQcgO1cyLNbB7orKKjTSC3udhAo93ugQ pwlHZq4wDGsq19EYmHVlfgr4ye0T/MPZsIFIl7bIba7UcNGPkxYFn3749sUKnPdamx0= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvSWHr5lfY9/nQsLQ/xtcoN5H/TnQG/diC4+HETHxLaXc3hsyyp9KU08UKDDy7 mmaD6vBBDi10ugNwYcSs2al3O0qOa6dOX9D8yuVM5xyUEn4s3UcHTV9CdmZdCecAWRuGR/dfkG8 Ql2OHaUOk+QiT22h1Fa2NzKVdLazVG5C1zfytWr8/QtTiYDHEjvk9jFeHfJaBi4GE2V/zxHtycv sT5iYyEBkf02Ikn1g8GlRGe6NY6yxlBsBi+4fgdOY5AUbQ6H0aUqpU6axpcA8NZST/RXt0sFEy7 juPJ66EzPIjMQOJG+yI+6BvdBv8LWtHJY5idNJ/8Nto6qOVyJlU4hAAlwEdkYyMw3ElovqI/ub6 jBGyKMDrGsu89wewkFony10bqBhPbvYHg0+iqCtsSlzyXAdoXRS530iLFk8BEw8sAYpPMqY6daQ 2dNcnhSDMKt0BdEnb0nMzNre/ToHiBW8u1E2/r348NZjyVz9Xb0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEzlLhnjrljziZsPJD+6TFphu87RW7odVOmHqBJgKS1HNWc+2CO5ak3CF5B+KTraiO0uH2Sxw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1b07:b0:450:3c49:519 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-450743f38afmr1702472b6e.7.1762966355944; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:52:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:8803:e7e4:500:d404:301b:b985:c499? ([2600:8803:e7e4:500:d404:301b:b985:c499]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 006d021491bc7-656c57ec231sm8495588eaf.17.2025.11.12.08.52.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:52:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:52:34 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: spi: Add spi-buses property To: Mark Brown Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Marcelo Schmitt , Michael Hennerich , =?UTF-8?Q?Nuno_S=C3=A1?= , Jonathan Cameron , Andy Shevchenko , Sean Anderson , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org References: <20251014-spi-add-multi-bus-support-v1-0-2098c12d6f5f@baylibre.com> <20251014-spi-add-multi-bus-support-v1-1-2098c12d6f5f@baylibre.com> <20251021142129.GA34073-robh@kernel.org> <14ae0769-341b-4325-b925-7bba6d57bbdf@baylibre.com> <20251030135126.GA3749313-robh@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: David Lechner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/10/25 11:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 05:42:44PM -0500, David Lechner wrote: >> On 10/30/25 8:51 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> But it can't really be 2 independent buses/controllers unless the ADC >>> has 2 completely independent interfaces, right? > >> Correct. > >> The proposed property really only concerns the data lines (tx/rx). It doesn't >> care if there is 1 or 2 SCLK lines and it doesn't care if there is only 1 CS >> line. > >> So maybe spi-data-buses would be a better name for the property? Or >> spi-data-ports (using the NXP FlexSPI controller docs terminology)? >> Or spi-data-channels? > > This bindings discussion seems to have stalled out? Yes, it seems so. I sent a v2 with with the property changed to "spi-data-buses" in hopes that that it would be good enough, or if not, get the conversation going again. [1] [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20251107-spi-add-multi-bus-support-v2-1-8a92693314d9@baylibre.com/