From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=m Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:53:20 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20170922092621.uq2xsvxangeetewi@sirena.org.uk> <9dc8b064-8a6c-98d2-4ade-088cbfd56fb1@infradead.org> <20170925161221.v23dpeljin5kakhz@sirena.org.uk> <449abd0e-8d8b-86e9-2b7a-65c27ab3171b@infradead.org> <20170925192256.bmrm6gmb4idvomxb@sirena.org.uk> <156431d9-a518-53e7-17d9-bb1ee0f637bb@infradead.org> <20170925194417.bjkw5ar6s57bkbdt@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , LKML , linux-spi To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170925194417.bjkw5ar6s57bkbdt-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On 09/25/17 12:44, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:31:03PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 09/25/17 12:22, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> In this case the problem is even more basic in that the driver does >>> actually depend on having hwspinlocks for any production use. > >> so just add: >> depends on HWSPINLOCK > >> Is that satisfactory to you? > > That would then get in the way of build test coverage. I don't agree, but whatever. I give up. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html