From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-binding: spi: Document Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC controller bindings Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:55:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1543828720-18345-1-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> <1543828720-18345-3-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> <2e719883-4cfd-b456-b894-853e99515092@gmail.com> <8de55806-ee08-69c6-df1b-45b1eba607a6@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: juliensu@mxic.com.tw, Simon Horman , zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw To: Sergei Shtylyov , Mason Yang , broonie@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, boris.brezillon@bootlin.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8de55806-ee08-69c6-df1b-45b1eba607a6@cogentembedded.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On 12/05/2018 07:56 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 12/04/2018 09:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> Document the bindings used by the Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC SPI controller. >> >> RPC is SPI and HF controller, it is not a pure SPI controller. >> >> How does this deal with the HF part ? Keep in mind the bindings are ABI >> and it will be difficult to redo them later. > > Perhaps we need a "mode" prop, maybe w/vendor prefix? Or, like I said last time, discern it based on the DT subnode. It can be either SPI NOR or CFI NOR. >>> Signed-off-by: Mason Yang > [...] > > MBR, Sergei > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut