From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
herve.codina@bootlin.com, luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com,
conor+dt@kernel.org, Jason Kridner <jkridner@beagleboard.org>,
Deepak Khatri <lorforlinux@beagleboard.org>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@beagleboard.org>,
Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] devicetree: bindings: spi: Introduce SPI bus extensions
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:52:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c65d26d0-51b8-4131-a755-6c72b7dea549@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250729-spi-bus-extension-v1-4-b20c73f2161a@beagleboard.org>
On 29/07/2025 11:51, Ayush Singh wrote:
> An SPI bus can be wired to the connector and allows an add-on board to
> connect additional SPI devices to this bus.
>
... so I found the binding. Not marked by my filters due to non-standard
subject.
Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
explained here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters
> Those additional SPI devices could be described as sub-nodes of the SPI
> bus controller node however for hotplug connectors described via device
> tree overlays there is additional level of indirection, which is needed
> to decouple the overlay and the base tree:
>
> --- base device tree ---
>
> spi1: spi@abcd0000 {
> compatible = "xyz,foo";
> spi-bus-extension@0 {
> spi-bus = <&spi_ctrl>;
> };
> ...
> };
>
> spi5: spi@cafe0000 {
> compatible = "xyz,bar";
> spi-bus-extension@0 {
> spi-bus = <&spi_sensors>;
> };
> ...
> };
>
> connector {
> spi_ctrl: spi-ctrl {
> spi-parent = <&spi1>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> spi_sensors: spi-sensors {
> spi-parent = <&spi5>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
> };
It looks like you are re-doing I2C work. Please wait till I2C discussion
finishes, so we won't have to comment on the same in multiple places.
>
> --- device tree overlay ---
>
> ...
> // This node will overlay on the spi-ctrl node of the base tree
> spi-ctrl {
> eeprom@50 { compatible = "atmel,24c64"; ... };
> };
> ...
>
> --- resulting device tree ---
>
> spi1: spi@abcd0000 {
> compatible = "xyz,foo";
> spi-bus-extension@0 {
> spi-bus = <&spi_ctrl>;
> };
> ...
> };
>
> spi5: spi@cafe0000 {
> compatible = "xyz,bar";
> spi-bus-extension@0 {
> spi-bus = <&spi_sensors>;
> };
> ...
> };
>
> connector {
> spi_ctrl: spi-ctrl {
> spi-parent = <&spi1>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> device@1 { compatible = "xyz,foo"; ... };
> };
>
> spi_sensors: spi-sensors {
> spi-parent = <&spi5>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
> };
>
> Here spi-ctrl (same goes for spi-sensors) represent the part of SPI bus
> that is on the hot-pluggable add-on. On hot-plugging it will physically
> connect to the SPI adapter on the base board. Let's call the 'spi-ctrl'
> node an "extension node".
>
> In order to decouple the overlay from the base tree, the SPI adapter
> (spi@abcd0000) and the extension node (spi-ctrl) are separate nodes.
>
> The extension node is linked to the SPI bus controller in two ways. The
> first one with the spi-bus-extension available in SPI controller
> sub-node and the second one with the spi-parent property available in
> the extension node itself.
>
> The purpose of those two links is to provide the link in both direction
> from the SPI controller to the SPI extension and from the SPI extension
> to the SPI controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml
> index 82d051f7bd6e09dab9809c85ff13475d2b118efd..9b44ce4542f9552c94cb0658ffe3f6d3f29bc434 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml
> @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@ properties:
> "#size-cells":
> const: 0
>
> + spi-parent:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> + description:
> + In case of an SPI bus extension, reference to the SPI bus controller
> + this extension is connected to. In other word, reference the SPI bus
> + controller on the fixed side that drives the bus extension.
> +
> cs-gpios:
> description: |
> GPIOs used as chip selects.
> @@ -111,7 +118,26 @@ properties:
> - compatible
>
> patternProperties:
> - "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
> + 'spi-bus-extension@[0-9a-f]+$':
> + type: object
> + description:
> + An SPI bus extension connected to an SPI bus. Those extensions allow to
> + decouple SPI busses when they are wired to connectors.
I really do not get why you need separate two-way phandles for marking
parent child relationship. IOW, if you need two way, then why not graphs?
Or why not just making the device@2 a child of SPI, since it is coming
from overlay.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 9:50 [PATCH 0/4] spi: Introduce spi bus extensions Ayush Singh
2025-07-29 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] spi: Follow spi-parent when retrieving a controller from node Ayush Singh
2025-07-29 9:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] spi: Move children registration in a dedicated function Ayush Singh
2025-07-29 9:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] spi: Handle spi bus extension Ayush Singh
2025-07-29 12:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-29 12:52 ` Ayush Singh
2025-07-29 13:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-29 9:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] devicetree: bindings: spi: Introduce SPI bus extensions Ayush Singh
2025-07-29 12:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-07-30 15:45 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-07-30 18:30 ` Andrew Davis
2025-07-29 13:12 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c65d26d0-51b8-4131-a755-6c72b7dea549@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=ayush@beagleboard.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=jkridner@beagleboard.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorforlinux@beagleboard.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=robertcnelson@beagleboard.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).