From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Rebind and s2ram fixes
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:31:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1656341824.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> (raw)
Hi all,
The Renesas RPC-IF provides either HyperFlash or SPI host access.
To handle this, three drivers are used:
1. The RPC-IF core diver,
2. An HyperFlash child driver,
3. An SPI child driver.
Currently this driver collection has the following issues:
1. After manually unbinding the child driver, rebinding the child
driver fails with -EBUSY,
2. During PSCI system suspend, the SoC may be powered down, losing
RPC-IF register state, and causing data corruption after resume.
This patch series aims to fix this:
- Patches 1-4 contain preparatory cleanups and improvements,
- Patch 5 fixes unbind/rebind,
- Patch 6 cleans up the internal API between the RPC-IF core diver,
and the HF and SPI child drivers, and thus touches the MTD/HYPERBUS
and SPI subsystems, too,
- Patch 7 adds system suspend/resume support to the RPC-IF core
driver.
This has been tested on the Salvator-XS (HyperFlash) and Falcon (QSPI
FLASH) development boards.
At least with HyperFlash, successful RPC-IF operation after s2ram is
still not guaranteed (more details below).
I do not have physical access to a board that uses the RPC-IF in SPI
mode, so I could not test s2ram with RPC-SPI. I am wondering if it
suffers from similar problems, or if these are purely related to
HyperFlash?
Findings:
- Sometimes RPC-HF still works after resume from s2ram
- Sometimes RPC-HF read data is corrupted after resume from s2ram:
- Data read looks like (for each block of 16 bytes at offset i):
- 8 bytes of data stored at offset (i % 262144) * 256,
- 8 bytes duplicate of the above.
- After that, unbind/rebind fails:
# echo rpc-if-hyperflash > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/rpc-if-hyperflash/unbind
# echo rpc-if-hyperflash > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/rpc-if-hyperflash/bind
rpc-if-hyperflash rpc-if-hyperflash: probing of hyperbus device failed
- After doing s2ram again, rebind (usually) succeeds again, and
reading from HF returns the expected data again:
# echo rpc-if-hyperflash > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/rpc-if-hyperflash/bind
rpc-if-hyperflash: Found 1 x16 devices at 0x0 in 16-bit bank. Manufacturer ID 0x000001 Chip ID 0x007000
- When doing unbind before s2ram, rebind after resume usually
works (better success rate than without unbind), but not always.
Things I have tried:
- Always resetting the device in rpcif_hw_init(), like is done on
RZ/G2L, does not make a difference.
- Dumping the full RPC register space before/after s2ram, but there
does not seem to be any relation between register contents (which
vary) and successful operation.
- Adding HF calibration like hbmc-am654 (and never setting the
controller's calibrated flag) does not help: either calibration
succeeds with 5 passes on 5 tries, or fails with 0 passes on 25
tries.
- Browsing the TF/A and U-Boot sources also didn't help.
Thanks for your comments!
Geert Uytterhoeven (7):
memory: renesas-rpc-if: Always use dev in rpcif_sw_init()
memory: renesas-rpc-if: Add dev helper to rpcif_probe()
memory: renesas-rpc-if: Improve Runtime PM handling
memory: renesas-rpc-if: Split-off private data from struct rpcif
memory: renesas-rpc-if: Move resource acquisition to .probe()
memory: renesas-rpc-if: Pass device instead of rpcif to rpcif_*()
memory: renesas-rpc-if: Reinitialize registers during system resume
drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/mtd/hyperbus/rpc-if.c | 18 ++--
drivers/spi/spi-rpc-if.c | 14 +--
include/memory/renesas-rpc-if.h | 32 ++----
4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-27 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-27 15:31 Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2022-06-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Always use dev in rpcif_sw_init() Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Add dev helper to rpcif_probe() Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Improve Runtime PM handling Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Split-off private data from struct rpcif Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Move resource acquisition to .probe() Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-29 17:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-29 17:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-29 18:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-29 18:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-30 8:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-30 9:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Pass device instead of rpcif to rpcif_*() Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-29 18:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-30 7:25 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-30 8:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-30 8:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-06-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Reinitialize registers during system resume Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-11-23 14:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1656341824.git.geert+renesas@glider.be \
--to=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).