From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10C3C001B0 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234768AbjGMMjZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:39:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53742 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233286AbjGMMjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:39:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49592691 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3fbd33a57dcso6186375e9.0 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:39:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1689251961; x=1691843961; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o7hFNGhDsoWdE2O4YN92/eI74pnG6KmIvX3zGxiiC/w=; b=xbQMjfJYZG5xGlH7W6WxJgCSO9B5u7zU/wqu37zOULkyPHL+nxjsCwcQBabaoBNZHc 79LkTqtZQV4tNueCmdjmb2jxSTFyYbz7PD30zKWi7Tto+htv3geXFknI738sJESeY9nD imub6y3bVMCm5mw9dCarK+wvUuGONdC1E6R0khWlF5oRtNxhwkwSFystJFL5ULCg9Sse ha2Q7RV6PTnXH0g9vqaBRugZAGv0B6Yahrl/x7GsRdJiLBzzy7eJvIn9HpO+dB6ia1Qv tPsw0AzywAWaNWlpbJPzxTW5H2EmMURCzIB2ghhB47ZmnUPsTU2MusouAxS+qzl4/abE UhGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689251961; x=1691843961; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o7hFNGhDsoWdE2O4YN92/eI74pnG6KmIvX3zGxiiC/w=; b=a2o7fwG7mndxswngoRYK02Ckl2/qiz8E8Xr7igW9T/s9qWCErKvU6Y2q7Tl7ukokFv fC/hkH7qjSP6PLh3Q4tp8tEHcHtXNVjfKp8VX8KJXm21IdsfOd7R3rHtn+xmzaInJ7bS 9dDi65fvNHFaUgR4rZkVabe7OiIK1X7MRVI+IQzOcwoXqJeFqTLsGK+9TMlypgIiWf3s h6toaQ10br3g8RHdfs66pAl1L7nfypjeBsyH6U4A7NiRmtONUVd2uzMKg71QCQjQHWb4 WKrvBMv2f5sWSjiGq9/JCo6//z5ZO30r/eJNM6HMQTrlQMeeje9i0R4nLO2VFH48PtUY vrAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaPhE7OLZi890tMUDqASh3BJsGwFQON91S7VTAY9qrqYIT++Srx ifJjkKm9trbb0aSQM0Bgys8p7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlESELdVE1fjqV5C6AI5MqR/qUJYMMbrNP3VdlOetvKF5lMSl6c1ybsvTRlGq+uNjpRK5ta+xw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:151:b0:3fb:a46c:7eac with SMTP id w17-20020a05600c015100b003fba46c7eacmr1409580wmm.7.1689251961370; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.223.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f18-20020a7bcd12000000b003fa999cefc0sm7728504wmj.36.2023.07.13.05.39.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 05:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:39:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: spi: constrain minItems of clocks and clock-names To: Mark Brown , William Qiu Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Emil Renner Berthing , Linus Walleij References: <20230713090015.127541-1-william.qiu@starfivetech.com> <20230713090015.127541-3-william.qiu@starfivetech.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org On 13/07/2023 14:28, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 05:00:14PM +0800, William Qiu wrote: > >> The SPI controller only need apb_pclk clock to work properly on JH7110 SoC, >> so there add minItems whose value is equal to 1. Other platforms do not >> have this constraint. > > Presumably this means that this is some variant of the usual pl022 IP, Hm, in such case this could mean we need dedicated compatible. > or that the clock is in fact present but is not modelled in your DT? Best regards, Krzysztof