From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Marcelo Schmitt" <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>,
"Michael Hennerich" <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Sean Anderson" <sean.anderson@linux.dev>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7380: add spi-buses property
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:45:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2ac13fc-8f47-465e-8cef-e2e34bf41818@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+ZZE0g424jE75xeCt2KY1ThPLqmbmOs0o_ddaJ8fOf3w@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/19/25 7:18 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 11:46 AM David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/18/25 9:59 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:52:51PM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
>>>> Add spi-buses property to describe how many SDO lines are wired up on
>>>> the ADC. These chips are simultaneous sampling ADCs and have one SDO
>>>> line per channel, either 2 or 4 total depending on the part number.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7380.yaml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7380.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7380.yaml
>>>> index b91bfb16ed6bc6c605880f81050250d1ed9c307a..9ef46cdb047d45d088e0fbc345f58c5b09083385 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7380.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7380.yaml
>>>> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ properties:
>>>> spi-cpol: true
>>>> spi-cpha: true
>>>>
>>>> + spi-data-buses:
>>>> + minItems: 1
>>>> + maxItems: 4
>>>> +
>>>
>>> As the property is not required, what's the default?
>>
>> spi-perepheral-props.yaml defines:
>>
>> default: [0]
>>
>> Do I need to repeat that here?
>
> No. So that means you only use one channel and the others are not connected?
Correct.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> vcc-supply:
>>>> description: A 3V to 3.6V supply that powers the chip.
>>>>
>>>> @@ -245,6 +249,22 @@ allOf:
>>>> patternProperties:
>>>> "^channel@[0-3]$": false
>>>>
>>>> + # 2-channel chip can only have up to 2 buses
>>>> + - if:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - adi,ad7380
>>>> + - adi,ad7381
>>>> + - adi,ad7386
>>>> + - adi,ad7387
>>>> + - adi,ad7388
>>>> + - adi,ad7389
>>>> + then:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + spi-data-buses:
>>>> + maxItems: 2
>>>> +
>>>> examples:
>>>> - |
>>>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>>> @@ -260,6 +280,7 @@ examples:
>>>> spi-cpol;
>>>> spi-cpha;
>>>> spi-max-frequency = <80000000>;
>>>> + spi-data-buses = <0>, <1>;
>>>>
>>>> interrupts = <27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
>>>> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
>>>> @@ -284,6 +305,7 @@ examples:
>>>> spi-cpol;
>>>> spi-cpha;
>>>> spi-max-frequency = <80000000>;
>>>> + spi-data-buses = <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>;
>>>
>>> An example that doesn't look like a 1 to 1 mapping would be better.
>>> Otherwise, it still looks to me like you could just define the bus
>>> width.
>>
>> I'm not sure we could do that on this chip since it doesn't have
>> the possibility of more than one line per channel.
>
> That's a property of the SPI controller though, right?
>
> If the above controller had 4 lines per channel/serializer, then you could have:
>
> spi-data-buses = <0>, <4>, <8>, <12>;
Ah, I get what you mean now. The intention here though was that the
index numbers correspond to the data lane (channel/serializer), not
to individual lines. So the example you gave would mean that the chip
has at least 13 data lanes (rather than what I think your intention was
of saying it has at least 16 data wires). I did it that way because all
of the hardware I looked at didn't allow assigning arbitrary data lines
to arbitrary lanes/channels so it keeps things simpler and easier to match
to the actual hardware docs.
I intend to change the property name to data-lanes so I will use that
below instead of spi-data-buses.
For this ADC, I would still write:
data-lanes: <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>;
to mean:
+--------------+ +----------+
| SPI | | AD7380-4 |
| Controller | | ADC |
| | | |
| SDIA0 |<---| SDOA |
| SDIA1 |x | |
| SDIA2 |x | |
| SDIA3 |x | |
| | | |
| SDIB0 |<---| SDOB |
| SDIB1 |x | |
| SDIB2 |x | |
| SDIB3 |x | |
| | | |
| SDIC0 |<---| SDOC |
| SDIC1 |x | |
| SDIC2 |x | |
| SDIC3 |x | |
| | | |
| SDID0 |<---| SDOD |
| SDID1 |x | |
| SDID2 |x | |
| SDID3 |x | |
| | | |
+--------------+ +---------+
I.e. lanes <0>=A, <1>=B, <2>=C, <3>=D and there is an implied default
spi-rx-bus-width = <1>;
For another chip we are working on, we could have:
spi-rx-bus-width = <4>;
data-lanes: <0>, <1>;
Meaning:
+--------------+ +----------+
| SPI | | AD4630 |
| Controller | | ADC |
| | | |
| SDIA0 |<---| SDOA0 |
| SDIA1 |<---| SDOA1 |
| SDIA2 |<---| SDOA2 |
| SDIA3 |<---| SDOA3 |
| | | |
| SDIB0 |<---| SDOB0 |
| SDIB1 |<---| SDOB1 |
| SDIB2 |<---| SDOB2 |
| SDIB3 |<---| SDOB3 |
| | | |
| SDIC0 |x | |
| SDIC1 |x | |
| SDIC2 |x | |
| SDIC3 |x | |
| | | |
| SDID0 |x | |
| SDID1 |x | |
| SDID2 |x | |
| SDID3 |x | |
| | | |
+--------------+ +---------+
>
> Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 20:52 [PATCH v2 0/6] spi: add multi-bus support David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-data-buses property David Lechner
2025-11-18 15:57 ` Rob Herring
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] spi: Support multi-bus controllers David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] spi: add multi_bus_mode field to struct spi_transfer David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] spi: axi-spi-engine: support SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE David Lechner
2025-11-11 15:12 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-11-12 16:59 ` David Lechner
2025-11-15 14:16 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-11-15 14:17 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7380: add spi-buses property David Lechner
2025-11-18 15:59 ` Rob Herring
2025-11-18 17:46 ` David Lechner
2025-11-19 13:18 ` Rob Herring
2025-11-19 14:45 ` David Lechner [this message]
2025-12-04 14:28 ` Rob Herring
2025-12-04 16:01 ` David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: adc: ad7380: Add support for multiple SPI buses David Lechner
2025-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] spi: add multi-bus support Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2ac13fc-8f47-465e-8cef-e2e34bf41818@baylibre.com \
--to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt@analog.com \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox