public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/*
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 08:48:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210404064808.GA1401@agape.jhs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <844503af879d05b209d9af98e378350b4f74ff9d.camel@perches.com>

On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 01:02:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 19:28 +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:17:37AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 17:21 +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:02:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 11:13 +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > > > > > This patchset removes all RT_TRACE usages in core/ files.
> > > > > 
> > > > > and hal and include and os_dep
> > > > 
> > > > Hi, 
> > > > 
> > > > I was just about to send the second patchset relative to hal/ files.
> > > > The whole has been split up in directories in order to reduce the
> > > > number of patch per patchset
> > > 
> > > > It's a good idea, but the patches relative to RT_TRACE removal
> > > > could be huge
> > > 
> > > That's really not a significant issue.
> > > Simplicity in review is also important.
> > > Mechanization of patch creation can reduce review efforts.
> > 
> > Maybe I wrongly associated simplicity with patch dimensions, but maybe
> > for patches this simple have expert reviewers some tool for
> > automatic review?
> 
> Coccinelle is a relatively trusted tool and using it as a scripting
> mechanism where the script is shown as part of the commit message
> gives confidence that the change it produces can be applied without
> significant doubt.
> 
> To improve confidence that any change that does not have an output
> object code delta, comparing the object code produced before and
> after the change is useful.  Showing that the code has been both
> compiled and compared in the commit message also improves confidence
> that the change is useful and can be applied.
> 
> 

which tool provides an object code delta output suitable for a commit message?

I dare a proposal apologizing in advance if this question should sound off topic,
if it is please tell me how to ask it,

is anyone of you all available being my mentor?

I realized that what you told me in last weeks helps me a lot, and maybe
a mentor can address me working towards more useful code bases.

I choosed rtl8723bs quite by random, just to make experience in cleaning up code,
and get more confident with required dev tools, but if there is some other task 
with higher priority that I could carry on, I will be glad to
follow directives of a mentor. I really would like to become an expert kernel developer,
and the way community works gets me more and more involved.

Thank you again to all people helping me,

fabio

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-04  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-03  9:13 [PATCH v3 00/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/* Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 01/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_xmit.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 02/30] staging: rtl8723bs: fix condition in if statement " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 03/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_security.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 04/30] staging: rtl8723bs: fix line exceed warning " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 05/30] staging: rtl8723bs: fix spaces around operator issues " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 06/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove all RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_eeprom.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 07/30] staging: rtl8723bs: fix error prone if conditions " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 08/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove all RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_pwrctrl.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 09/30] staging: rtl8723bs: fix logical continuation issue " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 10/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unnecessary parentheses in if-condition " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 11/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_cmd.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 12/30] staging: rtl8723bs: fix null check conditions " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 13/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unnecessary parentheses in if condition " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 14/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove commented RT_TRACE calls in core/rtw_mlme.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 15/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 16/30] staging: rtl8723bs: tidy up some error handling " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:42   ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:50     ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03 10:04       ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 17/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_mlme_ext.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 18/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove commented RT_TRACE calls in core/rtw_recv.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 19/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 20/30] staging: rtl8723bs: added spaces around operator " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 21/30] staging: rtl8723bs: split long line " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 22/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unnecessary parentheses " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 23/30] staging: rtl8723bs: fix comparison in if condition " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03 15:24   ` Joe Perches
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 24/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove commented RT_TRACE call in core/rtw_ioctl_set.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 25/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 26/30] staging: rtl8723bs: place constant on the right side of the test " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 27/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove all RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_wlan_util.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 28/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_sta_mgt.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 29/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/rtw_ieee80211.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 30/30] staging: rtl8723bs: add spaces around operators " Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 00/30] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in core/* Joe Perches
2021-04-03 15:21   ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03 16:17     ` Joe Perches
2021-04-03 17:28       ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-03 20:02         ` Joe Perches
2021-04-04  6:48           ` Fabio Aiuto [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210404064808.GA1401@agape.jhs \
    --to=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox