From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84255CD1 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id iq13-20020a17090afb4d00b001bc4437df2cso2953366pjb.2 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:21:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fds8Vu27HO3VizdZYZX37G2L0kdPjlGJwjydpAC62lk=; b=kbDptrdu0f26KgjbD0o2z38w3lkKGDPgX1iTHeFHCTnyp8GdCq5qMftyKUSBh6duUj WfNj/A6u5i3SYTvNHtilrjGbJ7XPB9BN5cThiWBPQtUhCrDH1721OqL04qTC03fUauzy 3YHA9gzqSMuaks5H7GdDPribo7C8kJL0W2A2s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fds8Vu27HO3VizdZYZX37G2L0kdPjlGJwjydpAC62lk=; b=LVJPOB0JLMg81iLL4mCJHGo9suuoVSC/L5I1w9byDrzykoL0ZSbbS0874J/p9Kh68w a5BPyX/6NQI06kcJ7LT6urXEdcZ/nwImH2EmzWEXzPvjpichNOvF1wz5Ux++iOAIodqY C8AUjYyeheMc0IfWrp/ojOYdcls8l0avuG5w/SzIOwibcVNx4LBP23AAn9kW/oc+Dvd3 Hs1HpmMf5zLcDLI6l7322g5nEAmi72Kq3uRRbCeAVVn4yFijVW9shiQFtxy+lNw2Gp68 kRIm+asSDBVuMmExcdKwEkYcXUO8jjK0spZNGvLVVphgo6annbG+/cqYSqAHahQpu08Q UaBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531g3+vW7iyrY3bIXhMw4ybjO0IQgtSSF2GbSKWGWFTrF6dJBeBh /Gnq7Yqnv5EYhcl69zND7bIu5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFvMPIFzTXAIIVPlg/eGuYakalp78L+LNg6VrEL06CzJLvdAz6UlqMRKRHGibjFN8E9JB6yg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d86:b0:1bd:223f:6cb5 with SMTP id oj6-20020a17090b4d8600b001bd223f6cb5mr16669777pjb.151.1646158885116; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oa2-20020a17090b1bc200b001bcff056f09sm2678996pjb.13.2022.03.01.10.21.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:21:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:21:24 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Jakob Koschel Cc: Linus Torvalds , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Rasmus Villemoes , dri-devel , Cristiano Giuffrida , amd-gfx list , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-arch , CIFS , KVM list , linux-scsi , linux-rdma , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." , Jason Gunthorpe , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Dan Carpenter , Linux Media Mailing List , Arnd Bergman , Linux PM , intel-gfx , Brian Johannesmeyer , Nathan Chancellor , linux-fsdevel , Christophe JAILLET , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-tegra , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Shevchenko , Linux ARM , linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-block , Netdev , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List , tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Crypto Mailing List , dma , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr Message-ID: <202203011016.48A181EE50@keescook> References: <20220228110822.491923-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> <20220228110822.491923-3-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> <2e4e95d6-f6c9-a188-e1cd-b1eae465562a@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote: > Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing > in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by > submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule. > Sounds good? To help with this splitting, see: https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/split-on-maintainer It's not perfect, but it'll get you really close. For example, if you had a single big tree-wide patch applied to your tree: $ rm 0*.patch $ git format-patch -1 HEAD $ mv 0*.patch treewide.patch $ split-on-maintainer treewide.patch $ ls 0*.patch If you have a build log before the patch that spits out warnings, the --build-log argument can extract those warnings on a per-file basis, too (though this can be fragile). -- Kees Cook