From: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify control flow
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 18:46:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401224619.GA71483@euclid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkdvzIyz/WGlm2uy@iweiny-desk3>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 02:34:04PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:46:35AM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> > The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns
> > the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is
> > found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control
> > flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop.
> >
> > Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable
> > name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p.
> >
> > Reported by checkpatch:
> >
> > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
>
> Wow! Nice find! This is a huge clean up. Extra kudos recognizing that it is
> not just the else statement which is broken here!
Thanks! It took me a while to realize what this loop is doing.
> The only issue for the patch is that I don't see any maintainer emailed?
> However, I don't see a maintainer listed in the MAINTAINERS file so ...
>
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Thanks for the review!
Greg, please do not apply this yet. After I sent out the patch, I
noticed the comment at the top of the function:
/* Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList(). (Renamed from SecIsInPreAuthKeyList(), 2006-10-13.) */
So I did a git grep to find the original function and fix it as well,
and it looks like there are three copies of the same function in
different files:
$ git grep IsInPreAuthKeyList
r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c:/* Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList(). (Renamed from SecIsInPreAuthKeyList(), 2006-10-13.) */
rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c: * Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList().
rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c:/* Ported from 8185: IsInPreAuthKeyList(). (Renamed from SecIsInPreAuthKeyList(), 2006-10-13.) */
I will later send a v2 patch that replaces all of them.
Thanks
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 28 ++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> > index d5bb3a5bd2fb..3eacf8f9d236 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> > @@ -2036,28 +2036,14 @@ int rtw_restruct_wmm_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *in_ie, u8 *out_ie, uint in_
> >
> > static int SecIsInPMKIDList(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 *bssid)
> > {
> > - struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> > - int i = 0;
> > -
> > - do {
> > - if ((psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
> > - (!memcmp(psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))) {
> > - break;
> > - } else {
> > - i++;
> > - /* continue; */
> > - }
> > -
> > - } while (i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE);
> > -
> > - if (i == NUM_PMKID_CACHE) {
> > - i = -1;/* Could not find. */
> > - } else {
> > - /* There is one Pre-Authentication Key for the specific BSSID. */
> > - }
> > -
> > - return i;
> > + struct security_priv *p = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> > + int i;
> >
> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE; i++)
> > + if ((p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
> > + (!memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN)))
> > + return i;
> > + return -1;
> > }
> >
> > /* */
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 11:46 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify control flow Sevinj Aghayeva
2022-04-01 21:34 ` Ira Weiny
2022-04-01 22:46 ` Sevinj Aghayeva [this message]
2022-04-02 9:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-04-03 13:50 ` Sevinj Aghayeva
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-03 22:42 Sevinj Aghayeva
2022-04-12 23:48 ` Ira Weiny
[not found] ` <CAMWRUK6FaOC1+3ZP+af7uSyfAHjZ3KWwNqM1GjRYth+OyA-8EQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-04-13 3:01 ` Sevinj Aghayeva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220401224619.GA71483@euclid \
--to=sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).