From: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: simplify control flow
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 22:46:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220404024615.GA410484@euclid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220403164250.GA371601@euclid>
My apologies for forgetting to Cc the maintainers! Added them now.
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns
> the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is
> found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control
> flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop.
>
> Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable
> name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p.
>
> Reported by checkpatch:
>
> WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2: Put the conditional in a single line to avoid checkpatch
> complaint.
>
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index f94b1536a177..cddd8ab80236 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -1637,26 +1637,13 @@ int rtw_restruct_wmm_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *in_ie, u8 *out_ie, uint in_
>
> static int SecIsInPMKIDList(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 *bssid)
> {
> - struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> - int i = 0;
> -
> - do {
> - if ((psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
> - (!memcmp(psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))) {
> - break;
> - } else {
> - i++;
> - /* continue; */
> - }
> -
> - } while (i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE);
> + struct security_priv *p = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> + int i;
>
> - if (i == NUM_PMKID_CACHE) {
> - i = -1;/* Could not find. */
> - } else {
> - /* There is one Pre-Authentication Key for the specific BSSID. */
> - }
> - return i;
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE; i++)
> + if (p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed && !memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))
> + return i;
> + return -1;
> }
>
> /* */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-03 16:42 [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: simplify control flow Sevinj Aghayeva
2022-04-04 2:46 ` Sevinj Aghayeva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220404024615.GA410484@euclid \
--to=sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).