From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB7218BE5 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAADBC433C8; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:53:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1687182812; bh=kCKiD5fhFEy0gvMVk7RDP9g5QMN6OPehQVjGRcV+P8A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FAMVwzQmxhRioT42KFYyC7x9NbIPwZmIL+XoxvE/UrpB49eF9jv4TeItklHVLOPub RJ43cO6RPlhUsuVDb0XmOLn/BJ/7T7183OcrtHdGlZkzbM1pA44l5hAmV7zDCiZ6fH Vz5SWKZGu/oEJbir2k6gQNyI/argnwH2+f7x5DGU= Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 15:53:29 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Yogesh Hegde Cc: Philipp Hortmann , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Trivial code cleanup patches Message-ID: <2023061922-numeric-runner-f36d@gregkh> References: <2023061938-unbounded-unbent-e706@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 07:19:21PM +0530, Yogesh Hegde wrote: > Hi Greg, > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 02:57:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 10:26:37PM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote: > > > This patch series alone is fine. But when my patch series ([PATCH 0/9] > > > staging: rtl8192e: Remove unsupported modes a and 5G) is applied before it > > > fails as we change same lines. Will see what happens. > > > > Yes, none of these apply :( > > > > Yogesh, can you rebase this on my staging-next branch and resend? > Sure, will rebase and resend. Did you mean staging-testing branch instead of > staging-next branch ? Yes, sorry.