public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Staging Drivers <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: "Link in bio" instead of Link:/Closes: trailer
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:51:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023122112-rigging-january-7618@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZYQeZjN_3bPOdKKf@archie.me>

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:15:50PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Let's say that there is a content creator who submits her first kernel
> patch (touching drivers/staging/ of course to get her feet wet).
> The patch supposes to fix a reported bug, with appropriate Fixes: tag.
> But instead of using Link: or Closes: tag to the actual bug report in
> the patch, she instead writes "Link to the bug report in my bio", as
> it is the norm in social media world. Here in the context, her bio is
> LinkedIn profile (IDK if there is a way to add arbitrary link there).
> The link in LinkedIn profile, when clicked, will list many links
> (including her usual social media campaigns and of course the bug report),
> which makes reviewers confused about which link to the bug report she
> means. In some cases, she may disambiguate by saying in the patch,
> "Link to the bug report no. 99", to refer to the specific link number.
> 
> Is such practice a good idea?

No.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-21 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-21 11:15 "Link in bio" instead of Link:/Closes: trailer Bagas Sanjaya
2023-12-21 11:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-12-21 12:57   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-12-21 13:10     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-21 14:13       ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-12-23  0:42         ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-12-24  8:43           ` Bagas Sanjaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023122112-rigging-january-7618@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox