From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
masahiroy@kernel.org, John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net/staging: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:00:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222090042.12609-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (raw)
The drivers included in this series set the ethtool driver version to the
same as the default, UTS_RELEASE, so don't both doing this.
As noted by Masahiro in [0], with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y, some drivers could
be built as modules against a different kernel tree with differing
UTS_RELEASE. As such, these changes could lead to a change in behaviour.
However, defaulting to the core kernel UTS_RELEASE would be expected
behaviour.
These patches are for netdev and staging trees, and I hope that the
respective maintainers can pick up the patches separately.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK7LNASfTW+OMk1cJJWb4E6P+=k0FEsm_=6FDfDF_mTrxJCSMQ@mail.gmail.com/
John Garry (3):
rocker: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version
net: team: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version
staging: octeon: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 2 --
drivers/net/team/team.c | 2 --
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-mdio.c | 2 --
3 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 9:00 John Garry [this message]
2024-02-22 9:00 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] rocker: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version John Garry
2024-02-22 9:00 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: team: " John Garry
2024-02-22 9:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: octeon: " John Garry
2024-02-22 13:24 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net/staging: " Jiri Pirko
2024-02-24 3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240222090042.12609-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox