From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Atharva Tiwari <evepolonium@gmail.com>
Cc: Meir Elisha <meir6264@gmail.com>,
Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix network selection in rtw_mlme.c (completing todo)
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 11:21:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024122947-observant-nature-d4cf@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241226130029.1394-1-evepolonium@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 06:30:24PM +0530, Atharva Tiwari wrote:
> this patch fixes the network selection logic to avoid selecting a network
> with the same ESSID as the olddest scanned network if it was scanned
> within the last 500 millisecounds
>
> and please give a specific value for "new enough" on line 481,
> i have estimated 500 millisecound but inform me if the value
> needs to be changed
Why is this paragraph in a changelog? How is that going to work?
>
> Signed-off-by: Atharva Tiwari <evepolonium@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Changed the "new enough" value from 1000 millisecounds to 500
> - fixed some styling issue
You sent 4 copies of this, on different days, so I have no idea what the
"correct" one is :(
Please fix this up and send a v3 showing what is different from previous
versions and only send one copy.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-29 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-26 13:00 [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix network selection in rtw_mlme.c (completing todo) Atharva Tiwari
2024-12-29 10:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-25 15:50 Atharva Tiwari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024122947-observant-nature-d4cf@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=evepolonium@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=meir6264@gmail.com \
--cc=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox