From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A8A291C09 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752667217; cv=none; b=ToFPf1fuvGHJJdOzazI4wwueL6zXG6U2sp1m5UaZ5jQWLH+GCy0RyrdPkSonlKr6fEvHCskr9nJ2JA20XJflzxdtCfcfxkMpMCy4lw1s65oQpIzhOSJEXJrIfownTlVt3WzlqISr/eViUuxHWQXg+LOxoA+FRPGjSbAAni1ZF6M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752667217; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9J6L7nD5y/l9QYLzuxnlujD/YX9mrzTzB85d/jCYy7U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bQKV08qh4qg6HPQboqdjjy/QDLDTxCfQmwdIYOX80f+uK1uoN0Wi5chYwZ3nBdx0VCqIzMbrGcGuHvixGLNWs4v+abmS2BqKDuuBEX+FSCCR7Hokx2uyoxONqH54d90AumqTgAnY3RAIxO13/a+leXC3YejTWN4A47hKwWoc+sQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=DxcKQ7NF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="DxcKQ7NF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D4F1C4CEF0; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:00:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1752667216; bh=9J6L7nD5y/l9QYLzuxnlujD/YX9mrzTzB85d/jCYy7U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DxcKQ7NFejD2UUMN4Nnr5i9E23UJP14r4w01Mdl43gSMhpT69dI62F2/E87/Zg9gu 0G3VlnUBesfeS90B9KEOIhzENbCyYbgTiQqPYWD0gpHRj+L1USgKapyZq0deqftaNz Ez7Rdp1YGcghOztDfdWQL+1fpTdjVeE964G03Tao= Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:00:14 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Ignacio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pe=F1a?= Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: rtl8723bs: add missing blank line after declaration Message-ID: <2025071610-level-puritan-d840@gregkh> References: <20250716113740.73025-1-ignacio.pena87@gmail.com> <20250716113740.73025-2-ignacio.pena87@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250716113740.73025-2-ignacio.pena87@gmail.com> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:37:39AM -0400, Ignacio Peņa wrote: > From: Ignacio Pena > > Fix checkpatch warning by adding required blank line after variable > declaration in Efuse_CalculateWordCnts function. > > Signed-off-by: Ignacio Pena > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c > index abc123def..def456abc 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c > @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ u8 > Efuse_CalculateWordCnts(u8 word_en) > { > u8 word_cnts = 0; > + > if (!(word_en & BIT(0))) > word_cnts++; /* 0 : write enable */ > if (!(word_en & BIT(1))) > -- > 2.39.5 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot