Linux kernel staging patches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: Mohammad Amin Hosseini <moahmmad.hosseinii@gmail.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
	nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, sonic.zhang@analog.com,
	vapier@gentoo.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: iio: adc: ad7816: fix race condition in SPI operations
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 20:46:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250901204640.3cee61bc@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51042a87-0233-4748-b3c0-b167d3a4fa06@baylibre.com>

On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 12:00:44 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:

> On 9/1/25 11:03 AM, Mohammad Amin Hosseini wrote:
> > The ad7816 driver lacks proper synchronization around SPI operations
> > and device state access. Concurrent access from multiple threads can
> > lead to data corruption and inconsistent device state.
> > 
> > The driver performs sequences of GPIO pin manipulations followed by
> > SPI transactions without any locking. Device state variables (mode,
> > channel_id, oti_data) are also accessed without synchronization.
> > 
> > This bug was found through manual code review using static analysis
> > techniques. The review focused on identifying unsynchronized access
> > patterns to shared resources. Key indicators were:
> > - GPIO pin state changes followed by SPI operations without atomicity
> > - Shared state variables accessed from multiple sysfs entry points
> > - No mutex or spinlock protection around sections
> > - Potential for interleaved execution in multi-threaded environments
> > 
> > The review methodology involved tracing data flow paths and identifying
> > points where concurrent access could corrupt device state or SPI
> > communication sequences.
> > 
> > Add io_lock mutex to protect:
> > - SPI transactions and GPIO sequences in read/write functions
> > - Device state variables in sysfs show/store functions
> > - Concurrent access to chip configuration
> > 
> > This prevents race conditions when multiple processes access the device
> > simultaneously through sysfs attributes or device file operations.
> > 
> > Fixes: 7924425db04a ("staging: iio: adc: new driver for AD7816 devices")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mohammad Amin Hosseini <moahmmad.hosseinii@gmail.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Added locking to reader functions (show_mode, show_channel, show_oti)
> > - Fixed incomplete reader/writer synchronization that could still race
> > - Ensured all device state access is properly synchronized
> > - Replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() in all sysfs show functions
> > - Use sysfs_streq() instead of strcmp() for proper input parsing
> > - Implement locked/unlocked SPI function variants to prevent deadlock
> > - Use channel snapshot to ensure atomic read operations
> > - Fix sizeof() usage in spi_read to be more explicit (sizeof(buf))
> > - Make oti write operations atomic (SPI write + shadow update under lock)
> > - Fix race condition in ad7816_set_oti() by taking channel_id snapshot under lock
> > - Fix return type consistency (ssize_t vs int) in show functions
> > - Use chip->id instead of string comparison for channel validation
> > - Add explicit cast for narrowing assignment
> > - Add default case for unknown chip ID validation
> > - Use cansleep GPIO variants in sleepable context
> > - Improve lock documentation for protected resources
> > ---  
> 
> This is way to much to do in a single patch. Also, given that this
> part is obsolete [1] and this driver is in staging, is it really
> worth all of this effort to fix it up?
> 
> [1]: https://www.analog.com/en/products/ad7816.html

Sadly not obsolete (or at least not all of the supported parts).
I checked these out the other day - the ad7817 is a production part.

Biggest issue here is slow down!  Too may versions, without
time for thorough review before another one turns up.  Aim for
at least a few days, or a 1 week between versions.

Jonathan

> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-01 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-01 16:03 [PATCH v4] staging: iio: adc: ad7816: fix race condition in SPI operations Mohammad Amin Hosseini
2025-09-01 17:00 ` David Lechner
2025-09-01 19:46   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-01 19:00 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-09-01 20:01 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250901204640.3cee61bc@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=moahmmad.hosseinii@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=sonic.zhang@analog.com \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox