Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: rtl8723bs: use LIST_HEAD for stack-allocated list in xmit cleanup

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 11:11:50AM +0800, Can Peng wrote:
> Replace the separate declaration of 'tmplist' and subsequent
> INIT_LIST_HEAD() call with LIST_HEAD(), which declares and
> initializes the list head in a single idiomatic step. This
> improves code clarity and follows common kernel coding patterns
> without changing functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Can Peng <pengcan@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_xmit.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_xmit.c
> index abb6fdfe7e1f..8c227ddc8e53 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_xmit.c
> @@ -548,11 +548,10 @@ void rtl8723bs_free_xmit_priv(struct adapter *padapter)
>  	struct xmit_buf *pxmitbuf;
>  	struct __queue *pqueue = &pxmitpriv->pending_xmitbuf_queue;
>  	struct list_head *plist, *phead;
> -	struct list_head tmplist;
> +	LIST_HEAD(tmplist);
>  
>  
>  	phead = get_list_head(pqueue);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmplist);

Is this really needed?  I see the wish to clean stuff like this up, but
why?  What is causing this to happen?  The code is identical both ways,
right?

This feels like an odd change to me.

thanks,

greg k-h