public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mahad Ibrahim <mahad.ibrahim.dev@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mahad.ibrahim.dev@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix spacing coding style issues in HalHWImg8723B_BB.c
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 22:42:22 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260112174227.14922-6-mahad.ibrahim.dev@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112174227.14922-1-mahad.ibrahim.dev@gmail.com>

Fix checkpatch.pl checks regarding "spaces preferred around that"
operator.

Adhere to kernel coding standards by adding spaces around arithmetic and
bitwise operations.

Signed-off-by: Mahad Ibrahim <mahad.ibrahim.dev@gmail.com>
---
 .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalHWImg8723B_BB.c  | 34 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalHWImg8723B_BB.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalHWImg8723B_BB.c
index 630dace0af47..5fcb9420fb3d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalHWImg8723B_BB.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalHWImg8723B_BB.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void ODM_ReadAndConfig_MP_8723B_AGC_TAB(struct dm_odm_t *pDM_Odm)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ArrayLen; i += 2) {
 		u32 v1 = Array[i];
-		u32 v2 = Array[i+1];
+		u32 v2 = Array[i + 1];
 
 		/*  This (offset, data) pair doesn't care the condition. */
 		if (v1 < 0x40000000) {
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ void ODM_ReadAndConfig_MP_8723B_AGC_TAB(struct dm_odm_t *pDM_Odm)
 		} else {
 			/*  This line is the beginning of branch. */
 			bool bMatched = true;
-			u8  cCond  = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29|BIT28)) >> 28);
+			u8  cCond  = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29 | BIT28)) >> 28);
 
 			if (cCond == COND_ELSE) { /*  ELSE, ENDIF */
 				bMatched = true;
@@ -246,22 +246,22 @@ void ODM_ReadAndConfig_MP_8723B_AGC_TAB(struct dm_odm_t *pDM_Odm)
 				 *   Condition isn't matched.
 				 *   Discard the following (offset, data) pairs.
 				 */
-				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen-2)
+				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen - 2)
 					READ_NEXT_PAIR(v1, v2, i);
 
 				i -= 2; /*  prevent from for-loop += 2 */
 			} else {
 				/*  Configure matched pairs and skip to end of if-else. */
-				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen-2) {
+				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen - 2) {
 					odm_ConfigBB_AGC_8723B(pDM_Odm, v1, bMaskDWord, v2);
 					READ_NEXT_PAIR(v1, v2, i);
 				}
 
 				/*  Keeps reading until ENDIF. */
-				cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29|BIT28)) >> 28);
-				while (cCond != COND_ENDIF && i < ArrayLen-2) {
+				cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29 | BIT28)) >> 28);
+				while (cCond != COND_ENDIF && i < ArrayLen - 2) {
 					READ_NEXT_PAIR(v1, v2, i);
-					cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29|BIT28)) >> 28);
+					cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29 | BIT28)) >> 28);
 				}
 			}
 		}
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ void ODM_ReadAndConfig_MP_8723B_PHY_REG(struct dm_odm_t *pDM_Odm)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ArrayLen; i += 2) {
 		u32 v1 = Array[i];
-		u32 v2 = Array[i+1];
+		u32 v2 = Array[i + 1];
 
 		/*  This (offset, data) pair doesn't care the condition. */
 		if (v1 < 0x40000000) {
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ void ODM_ReadAndConfig_MP_8723B_PHY_REG(struct dm_odm_t *pDM_Odm)
 		} else {
 			/*  This line is the beginning of branch. */
 			bool bMatched = true;
-			u8  cCond  = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29|BIT28)) >> 28);
+			u8  cCond  = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29 | BIT28)) >> 28);
 
 			if (cCond == COND_ELSE) { /*  ELSE, ENDIF */
 				bMatched = true;
@@ -506,21 +506,21 @@ void ODM_ReadAndConfig_MP_8723B_PHY_REG(struct dm_odm_t *pDM_Odm)
 				 *   Condition isn't matched.
 				 *   Discard the following (offset, data) pairs.
 				 */
-				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen-2)
+				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen - 2)
 					READ_NEXT_PAIR(v1, v2, i);
 
 				i -= 2; /*  prevent from for-loop += 2 */
 			} else { /*  Configure matched pairs and skip to end of if-else. */
-				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen-2) {
+				while (v1 < 0x40000000 && i < ArrayLen - 2) {
 					odm_ConfigBB_PHY_8723B(pDM_Odm, v1, bMaskDWord, v2);
 					READ_NEXT_PAIR(v1, v2, i);
 				}
 
 				/*  Keeps reading until ENDIF. */
-				cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29|BIT28)) >> 28);
-				while (cCond != COND_ENDIF && i < ArrayLen-2) {
+				cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29 | BIT28)) >> 28);
+				while (cCond != COND_ENDIF && i < ArrayLen - 2) {
 					READ_NEXT_PAIR(v1, v2, i);
-					cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29|BIT28)) >> 28);
+					cCond = (u8)((v1 & (BIT29 | BIT28)) >> 28);
 				}
 			}
 		}
@@ -550,9 +550,9 @@ void ODM_ReadAndConfig_MP_8723B_PHY_REG_PG(struct dm_odm_t *pDM_Odm)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(Array_MP_8723B_PHY_REG_PG); i += 4) {
 		u32 v1 = Array[i];
-		u32 v2 = Array[i+1];
-		u32 v3 = Array[i+2];
-		u32 v4 = Array[i+3];
+		u32 v2 = Array[i + 1];
+		u32 v3 = Array[i + 2];
+		u32 v4 = Array[i + 3];
 
 		odm_ConfigBB_PHY_REG_PG_8723B(pDM_Odm, v1, v2, v3, v4);
 	}
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-12 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-12 17:42 [PATCH 00/10] staging: rtl8723bs: HAL coding style cleanup Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix block comment alignment in HalHWImg8723B_MAC.c Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix spaces around operator checks " Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix style and formatting " Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-16 13:01   ` Greg KH
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 04/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix block comment alignment in HalHWImg8723B_BB.c Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` Mahad Ibrahim [this message]
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix parenthesis and blank line issues " Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-16 13:03   ` Greg KH
2026-01-17 15:29     ` Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix block comment alignment in HalHWImg8723B_RF.c Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix style and alignment issues " Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix operator spacing " Mahad Ibrahim
2026-01-12 17:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix blank line checks " Mahad Ibrahim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260112174227.14922-6-mahad.ibrahim.dev@gmail.com \
    --to=mahad.ibrahim.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox