From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Minu Jin <s9430939@naver.com>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com,
zxcv2569763104@gmail.com, milospuric856@gmail.com,
karanja99erick@gmail.com, weibu@redadmin.org,
dan.carpenter@linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read()
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:25:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026012336-filter-starlight-0fb3@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122174125.2567008-1-s9430939@naver.com>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 02:41:23AM +0900, Minu Jin wrote:
> This series improves error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() and cleans up
> the code style to comply with kernel standards.
>
> In v6, I have reorganized the patches into a series of two to satisfy
> both Greg and Dan's feedback:
>
> 1. The first patch combines the logic change and caller updates.
> The function change and the caller updates must be in the same
> patch. If they are separated, the code will not work correctly
> or will cause errors at that specific point in the history.
>
> 2. The second patch focuses purely on code style cleanup (changing uint
> to unsigned int) as requested by Andy Shevchenko.
>
> Regarding the logic change in _rtw_pktfile_read():
>
> The original code used a ternary operator to read whatever data was
> available, even if it was less than requested. This could lead to
> callers processing incomplete data without knowing it.
>
> I have changed this to return -EINVAL when the remaining data is insufficient.
> This is safer because most callers expect the exact amount of data and
> should not proceed with a partial read.
>
> Changes in v6:
> - Reorganized into a 2-patch series to maintain git bisect safety.
> - Combined function logic changes with caller updates into Patch 1.
> - Separated style cleanup (uint -> unsigned int) into Patch 2.
Where is the list of changes for previous versions?
Also, was this tested on real hardware for this device? As you are
changing the main data path, that should be required here.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 17:41 [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-01-22 17:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: update _rtw_pktfile_read() to return error codes Minu Jin
2026-01-27 14:35 ` Greg KH
2026-01-22 17:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: clean up _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-01-23 6:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-01-23 7:26 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026012336-filter-starlight-0fb3@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=karanja99erick@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=milospuric856@gmail.com \
--cc=s9430939@naver.com \
--cc=weibu@redadmin.org \
--cc=zxcv2569763104@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox