From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Khushal Chitturi <khushalchitturi@gmail.com>
Cc: dan.carpenter@linaro.org, straube.linux@gmail.com,
hansg@kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] staging: rtl8723bs: coding style and refactoring cleanups
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 15:41:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026012735-wreckage-visible-8d33@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122164751.37796-1-khushalchitturi@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 10:17:48PM +0530, Khushal Chitturi wrote:
> This patch series performs minor refactoring and coding style cleanups in
> the rtl8723bs driver, focusing on rtw_xmit.c and addressing checkpatch.pl
> warnings.
>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v3 -> v4: Updated rename scope, cleaned up formatting, comments, and
> parentheses.
> v2 -> v3: Resubmitted as a versioned series to avoid threading confusion.
> v1 -> v2: Fixed incorrect commit messages.
>
> Note: I noticed this driver uses a custom N_BYTE_ALIGMENT macro for memory
> alignment. Would it be acceptable if I send a follow-up patch converting
> this to PTR_ALIGN since it's more commonly used in the kernel?
>
> Khushal Chitturi (3):
> staging: rtl8723bs: simplify boolean expressions
> staging: rtl8723bs: rename LinkDetectInfo and clean up related code
> staging: rtl8723bs: fix line length and alignment issues
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 102 ++++++------
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c | 15 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 16 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 10 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 149 +++++++++++-------
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 6 +-
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_xmit.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h | 31 ++--
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/os_intfs.c | 8 +-
> 12 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
Does not apply to my tree at all, please rebase and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 16:47 [PATCH v4 0/3] staging: rtl8723bs: coding style and refactoring cleanups Khushal Chitturi
2026-01-22 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify boolean expressions Khushal Chitturi
2026-01-22 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] staging: rtl8723bs: rename LinkDetectInfo and clean up related code Khushal Chitturi
2026-01-22 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] staging: rtl8723bs: fix line length and alignment issues Khushal Chitturi
2026-01-27 14:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026012735-wreckage-visible-8d33@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=khushalchitturi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox