public inbox for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Luka Gejak <lukagejak5@gmail.com>
Cc: straube.linux@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix out-of-bounds check in rtw_restruct_wmm_ie
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:13:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026012925-emblaze-barrel-46fc@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260129132352.14615-5-lukagejak5@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 02:23:51PM +0100, Luka Gejak wrote:
> Add a length check before accessing the OUI in WMM
> IE to prevent potential out-of-bounds reads.

Is this really a bugfix?  if so, it needs to go first, and be tagged for
stable trees.

> Use memcmp() for better readability.
> 
> Fixes: 554c0a3abf21 ("staging: Add rtl8723bs sdio wifi driver")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <lukagejak5@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index c4f58106b3bd..18a70879f78f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -2000,7 +2000,8 @@ int rtw_restruct_wmm_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *in_ie, u8 *out_ie, uint in_
>  	while (i < in_len) {
>  		ielength = initial_out_len;
>  
> -		if (in_ie[i] == 0xDD && in_ie[i+2] == 0x00 && in_ie[i+3] == 0x50  && in_ie[i+4] == 0xF2 && in_ie[i+5] == 0x02 && i+5 < in_len) { /* WMM element ID and OUI */
> +		if (i + 5 < in_len && in_ie[i] == 0xDD &&
> +		!memcmp(&in_ie[i + 2], "\x00\x50\xf2\x02", 4)) {

Very odd indentation :(

Also, why invert the i+5 check?  And the memcmp check is now messier
than the original.

And is that where you are saying this is a security fix?  If so, it's
just a read, not a write, so what is the security issue?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-29 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 13:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] staging: rtl8723bs: Cleanups and security fix Luka Gejak
2026-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] staging: rtl8723bs: rename u1bTmp to val Luka Gejak
2026-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix spacing around operators Luka Gejak
2026-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: rtl8723bs: modernize hex output in rtw_report_sec_ie Luka Gejak
2026-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: fix out-of-bounds check in rtw_restruct_wmm_ie Luka Gejak
2026-01-29 14:13   ` Greg KH [this message]
     [not found]     ` <CADRnA91+NQ=DLRSj+9SoTMBAEKDmzFiX98XR1+YCM2tgBiyDTQ@mail.gmail.com>
2026-01-30  5:26       ` Greg KH
2026-01-30  5:56         ` Luka Gejak
2026-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove dead debugging code in rtw_mlme_ext.c Luka Gejak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026012925-emblaze-barrel-46fc@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lukagejak5@gmail.com \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox