From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C47CD1EB5CE; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 14:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771858427; cv=none; b=JdsFHPqRAkj/mjXW/0YGMo3+Z7UVLd26s6ZOOzrWGDnuCEU/6uh7xsBHSgsDA7NpwViSqXlFNilemIZpbkFHlmqlwkhvM/Hb/cCXxYFHkbtowCmCuoLuRx1mSq6lwcO8XYTqWkgYNFiRCMfUIMhSJFfdVhFkWhiMj3H0cxG3lAg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771858427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lajNmXewljJWpXAOM9LPLTlDD0SeZiH5tYW+XYMPfZs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QzUW06n0gdX+Lm1sJwKt343GZEj+pt8xgnWOaxYc7/ieWjX4a4BkNdnlLXvqJzMJ5j2VnxnjylkHgmz0Nm2QMjAyX5ohOWfW8BEhOa6UNUTwJdhs0PJ/7qKgv+PYtrbalSKHkR2VsrWOUPkvobfrUud1/wdbYGJt7y9k+0cGMuQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Y2tG4/4V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Y2tG4/4V" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37CBBC116C6; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 14:53:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1771858426; bh=lajNmXewljJWpXAOM9LPLTlDD0SeZiH5tYW+XYMPfZs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y2tG4/4V7p/uDRmi0/ekED6oTeJSQID4FHBEgmiyXksvZsttMrD12CwxMgOa1gtYy 28BPjyfQjyKHHoh3bQsyaOO3O7rZI2EVh/es6QjsX2ajV82gbM3yzTbnQ6m00DfmEt yl70XtkzaxczXpx6FGrVqxD8/BErVHg3YTtq2L64= Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:46:59 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Juyeong Jun Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: split multiple assignment in osdep_service.c Message-ID: <2026022322-exposable-obtuse-4322@gregkh> References: <20260212111315.4979-1-juyeongjun.knu@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260212111315.4979-1-juyeongjun.knu@gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 08:13:16PM +0900, Juyeong Jun wrote: > v2:I fixed my git configuration. There are no code changes. > > Avoid multiple assignments in a single statement. > No functional change. > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c > index a00f9f0c85c5..19b378b49809 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c > @@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ struct rtw_cbuf *rtw_cbuf_alloc(u32 size) > cbuf = rtw_malloc(struct_size(cbuf, bufs, size)); > > if (cbuf) { > - cbuf->write = cbuf->read = 0; > + cbuf->write = 0; > + cbuf->read = 0; > cbuf->size = size; > } > > -- > 2.34.1 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the email signature. - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot