From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1C228C84A; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 17:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773075769; cv=none; b=cO2vNjDdhwEp4B5ZuCRxVhedTVUp0U9UuB2sKXbBOjpLXqzFgEPE2FQ8R723Ve43EfMD7blE5T8/aemdMNURBOQGbHSgdg9vyZlgOqu9Z1oOsG1Oc9DTYtOxsufEmyXYGlUoMEu+CrbHV4Y9dk5+mA5cp5W++AW+c1sI6Dbq3tY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773075769; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6/EaE9Uj1lukC/yGXo/EbU0Yg8PNOmSgAVBReOKuDCk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pMWmFkzDV98Mhi0xU3+SL1Cr59KkyioAWEy01AOEoWO4CSqURmZmxIILAjQNiPUPBITEms3VzJZ1swjWToRX02rgfj6tHXWS4EObNQSCLRHRsrTlxiVodBQxLWb5U4IX6paB4VdjOgPB7lBag9CVs20w5ksFvAJqZJAnbcOx8DE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=lgnM1ZyP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="lgnM1ZyP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EC7DC4CEF7; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 17:02:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1773075769; bh=6/EaE9Uj1lukC/yGXo/EbU0Yg8PNOmSgAVBReOKuDCk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lgnM1ZyP4oGRC6T5ivJ+08gsvfzs5pbjaWlmeMEiw1uSm3t6aDli13J2VIgi4mZbT IZjP28pjZWQ4vLXbk92P4jLsOQqqF5UT21asyzp5HLlyqlxX//KE7HcadtlAtF7g/z BRAUI9yIrL7U22vxqgBhFlJGzTY3zG/5hHWwxs/Q= Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:02:46 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Dipesh Chaudhary Cc: dan.carpenter@linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: add missing blank line after declarations Message-ID: <2026030931-bacon-automatic-60bf@gregkh> References: <377ca946-1421-4251-a459-f8924945c266@smtp-relay.sendinblue.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <377ca946-1421-4251-a459-f8924945c266@smtp-relay.sendinblue.com> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 04:57:29PM +0000, Dipesh Chaudhary wrote: > > Add a blank line after the pwrpriv declaration in rtw_set_ips_deny() > to satisfy checkpatch warnings and improve code readability. > > Signed-off-by: Dipesh Chaudhary > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c > index 666e241704d9..bd295bdd73f6 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c > @@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ void rtw_free_pwrctrl_priv(struct adapter *adapter) > inline void rtw_set_ips_deny(struct adapter *padapter, u32 ms) > { > struct pwrctrl_priv *pwrpriv = adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter); > + > pwrpriv->ips_deny_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ms); > } > > -- > 2.47.3 > > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot