From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B22F36E494; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777261834; cv=none; b=BY5h2dfiSRwHZsCMU6xa8fSA54+p3/NKV12oaJsQccXXHgcyQxZB5csVR9owYOULxptZyQoTpcgo5M5pwy401TDjKvZl6YiOdsHWjAUQxra0mxZ//4iiKrM+G7AXI/EPdLjDhAfyQtHurn0iPdgY/os3wTp5QeHZCAUWTpfQAbk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777261834; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6HSHMQCjRIRlwrkTSys6J4KqZN82MfGHjysuZEV32D8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HpiQh1ZQ3QT5OuLH2fPomj/Bb4YhjGa+A39mi1OMFMmEkvV8zU0YAp7GkqUkBUxga7mWTWBqkhgDeHzTm5A72RFa33pMjcc+2YwToFqSFusA+gyQj/aReaJARzQhUWyEJL52DRH8r7ETc28WJlp5YWjxlqw2UYX1f8IWoKd6uKY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=o/F2NEqW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="o/F2NEqW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 642C3C2BCB7; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:50:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1777261834; bh=6HSHMQCjRIRlwrkTSys6J4KqZN82MfGHjysuZEV32D8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=o/F2NEqWPrMj6q/b+JvbHPrU53i4pOADuKDQ8NN6T+0e+WlmFrX++QYKtuiQeIsTC TXztyyfPiB5G/JdGIFpOXBwu6rnLxKprj4+h4XoWrEFAir5zanSUBCefYUW4Cr5PN4 OrLecMVIOXztpOsdZkbtmEmo1W4lHnlmv04khjug= Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:06:27 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Xinhong Hu Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Ovidiu Panait , Gabriel Shahrouzi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: axis-fifo: align write wait_event args Message-ID: <2026042609-buckle-craftsman-1543@gregkh> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 07:24:36PM +0800, Xinhong Hu wrote: > The axis_fifo_write() wait_event_interruptible() call used different > continuation indentation than axis_fifo_read(). After matching the read > path, the second line exceeded 100 columns, so split the condition across > two continuation lines. > > Reported by checkpatch: > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > > Signed-off-by: Xinhong Hu > --- > drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c > index aa90b27197cf..aac2c58ef9b3 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c > @@ -246,7 +246,8 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf, > mutex_lock(&fifo->write_lock); > > ret = wait_event_interruptible(fifo->write_queue, > - ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET) >= words_to_write); > + ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET) >= > + words_to_write); Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - You sent a patch that has been sent multiple times in the past few days, and is identical to ones that has been recently rejected. Please always look at the mailing list traffic to determine if you are duplicating other people's work. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot