Linux kernel staging patches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Ning <feng@innora.ai>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Feng Ning <feng@innora.ai>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] staging: rtl8723bs: fix heap buffer overflow in cfg80211_rtw_add_key()
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 15:48:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260504154823.52057-1-feng@innora.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026050417-monkhood-backless-4c3e@gregkh>

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> What about these review comments:
>         https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260427111738.33069-1-feng@innora.ai
>
> Are they incorrect?
>
> And was this tested on real hardware?

Hi Greg,

Thank you for the pointer to the Sashiko review.

Regarding the review comment (Medium): Sashiko suggests returning -EINVAL
when params->seq_len exceeds sizeof(param->u.crypt.seq), rather than
silently truncating with min_t().

The comment raises a valid point.  I chose min_t() for two reasons:

  1. The upstream cfg80211 framework does not enforce an upper bound on
     seq_len before reaching the driver, so a strict -EINVAL could
     break any existing userspace that happens to pass seq_len > 8
     (even if no standard cipher requires more than 6 bytes).

  2. Staging drivers historically favour silent clamping over hard
     rejections for parameters that are out of the ordinary but
     otherwise harmless -- the primary goal was to close the overflow,
     not to police the caller.

That said, I can see the argument for -EINVAL: it makes the contract
explicit and avoids installing a key with a truncated sequence counter
that could produce unexpected crypto behaviour.

I am happy to send v7 with -EINVAL if you prefer that approach.
Alternatively, if min_t() is acceptable as-is, I can add a brief
comment in the code explaining why truncation is intentional.

Please let me know which direction you prefer and I will follow up
promptly.

Regarding hardware testing: I do not currently have a physical
rtl8723bs device.  My verification was based on code review of the
cfg80211 key installation path and static analysis confirming that
ieee_param.crypt.seq is an 8-byte fixed buffer while params->seq_len
is fully userspace-controlled via NL80211_CMD_NEW_KEY.

I understand this is a limitation.  If hardware testing is required
before merge I can source a RTL8723BU/BS USB dongle (approximately
1-2 weeks), or alternatively a community member with the hardware
could confirm the fix.  Please advise on your preference.

Thanks,
Feng Ning


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-13 11:32 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix heap buffer overflow in cfg80211_rtw_add_key Feng Ning
2026-04-26 19:37 ` Greg KH
2026-04-27 11:17   ` [PATCH v6] staging: rtl8723bs: fix heap buffer overflow in cfg80211_rtw_add_key() Feng Ning
2026-05-04 14:12     ` Greg KH
2026-05-04 15:48       ` Feng Ning [this message]
2026-05-04 16:03         ` Greg KH
2026-05-04 16:38           ` Feng Ning
2026-05-04 17:01             ` Greg KH
2026-05-05 20:04               ` Luka Gejak
2026-05-04 16:48       ` Luka Gejak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260504154823.52057-1-feng@innora.ai \
    --to=feng@innora.ai \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox