From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB5E23C13EF; Thu, 14 May 2026 12:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778762515; cv=none; b=fpnWwTqNjJscRZ8gvvHeJyP+RuWHpvAUn1fmr//b2TV1DCr8yqyzQKuxh+UxXufE/7hzgaZlWwuRB63wEBNBpajpXaqYcdopR1v4ZC1CY6uGKVcpoQ+7wJ5h1+WiCrJcf2Ea3za+d2ICeviW0JykLwWSPESVUKjfzRsGcfRvXbs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778762515; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WijtTe8uSs9JsujZPjhv0DUy0mOjITrzfiwWnQWJ6Zg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qClPw3PjyNwXKMp2g6N+DZv9Q3YMvhVEsrtVQEk8au6ba6rxvFJNGjnTmjjB3P2A/CXKwq0ChbgLyIeiLlnB/Pz4p+Jo1SINo/ZbEdGDAOlqgRT7ElgL+FObb4rvg9i11GxR/LlIigsC3IU2+3+TBI70fIazvAKf+KP1xoU7jnQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=DTBE/Yhm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="DTBE/Yhm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 368BBC2BCB3; Thu, 14 May 2026 12:41:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1778762515; bh=WijtTe8uSs9JsujZPjhv0DUy0mOjITrzfiwWnQWJ6Zg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DTBE/YhmLrYtj9u2UjuKJ70DFR0sFsnJty2sGn4Zfg/fWvvGx9r0W+89fwpkr1moE f3esmI+7WkRdKm0+BE+QKeOnp7zMAHirm/SeGf97HwbIwhxfZjLX8PZohlR3DmvPOy Ra1zkvD6cRYDJm2XuGERlY/cZvVq7zhrRxvVG7a0= Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 14:41:59 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Chhabilal Dangal Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: Add suspend checks to copyarea and imageblit Message-ID: <2026051449-default-unhearing-c7c7@gregkh> References: <20260514120102.71615-1-yogeshdangal66@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260514120102.71615-1-yogeshdangal66@gmail.com> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 05:46:02PM +0545, Chhabilal Dangal wrote: > lynxfb_ops_fillrect() already checks info->state before accessing > the hardware 2D engine, but lynxfb_ops_copyarea() and > lynxfb_ops_imageblit() do not. > > The suspend path calls fb_set_suspend(), which sets the framebuffer > state to FBINFO_STATE_SUSPENDED. Add matching state checks in the > remaining accelerated callbacks for consistency with fillrect(). > > Assisted-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic LLM) > Compile-tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Chhabilal Dangal > --- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c > index 9f3e3d37e..025ac8fe3 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c > @@ -204,6 +204,9 @@ static void lynxfb_ops_copyarea(struct fb_info *info, > struct sm750_dev *sm750_dev; > unsigned int base, pitch, bpp; > > + if (info->state != FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING) > + return; > + > par = info->par; > sm750_dev = par->dev; > > @@ -239,6 +242,9 @@ static void lynxfb_ops_imageblit(struct fb_info *info, > struct lynxfb_par *par; > struct sm750_dev *sm750_dev; > > + if (info->state != FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING) > + return; > + > par = info->par; > sm750_dev = par->dev; > /* > -- > 2.54.0 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot