From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com (mail-pg1-f170.google.com [209.85.215.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABEEC439010 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781607688; cv=none; b=JAntX7CbUQ0d83W2oH8MC/e++7ySYwMjf/gHYC5G8OSff6mcJiE2tqZOnyHiYPRB9UZnGp6HtoUGY+vl1+EJKgx2b70QDUeaafHn7tGjCms/12jTCMqmPyYby0ky+x3eUFPV+KSAS0dwvHn27mXNjmufuFGlS6AIDG6VA8e7zTc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781607688; c=relaxed/simple; bh=50F751gF+rXlNIyRBoGhHlcoVou6MOxU7OCNopSBl7E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=qIDL87qvOlO+JXwDpR6e3F5sSOnHzsCojMO85TgLWkAhxrfHgj8bsdZEg1dQTS5Xqwbld0kRterh7WpO8T7EdNXFbE4lkbFc24w+olUb2ZB87zObJ/ByB64zgzXO5AUaWtdyd4Wuaix6OtVAD8JXrZSDKtUgsGEfG7VglYj99W8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Sw9k/FAp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Sw9k/FAp" Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-c8585c51f1fso1944367a12.1 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:01:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1781607687; x=1782212487; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7WqqUitEfH9e229osynsO1JlKCUb6fQkndIHrjVVsHs=; b=Sw9k/FApv2IrrWHR/Nmr02T2B07XJs/aowTY/UjDkqWvPK/hcIqJKaSTXRYCRzpsFk Xe2/kEtEYDT3juRkOqUqPpXulM4znmoi0aZK11VneA2wFftHRWwnnYpt3tynE6i/1XhO B1FxGV9GIsfdB+IG7u38BNKfZ17QM41Av4bQ8OoV2JDGHQQV+j78HLM7u1RmlmQYBq9I iF/ovyd59wFTfCClKHe27kjviRByB73INmbGIqSa9BHy+trtSBeUnvvp5/vKr5pVz0so TP8LzIikphDPh/3JnfE9WfTYc5MrJ2y4GvfOtJcDd5krvGb9fjCiMPzm/6JMnUwBq/ca ZiiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781607687; x=1782212487; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7WqqUitEfH9e229osynsO1JlKCUb6fQkndIHrjVVsHs=; b=AaHAQi4rnunmgC02Wnzb0h+oFGWzdcImoNUEfnklyoBntdhJquY+7GbK75qbpwz8e0 XFzCt1Bro7LX7zbWOEZuojG243aAUJikCOfAGArc0HJn7PzA57SCHN1cdj2YVNLRQ8Wz Qc7aX8hf/UZD1+ogaUny43fg9xlRQez3yikEeOHfkzAqFGp78aFPmLgIJvtPLcCiNzZn ijp5o4w4IL15n2OkmVlG9YDJdrn95Sex4X9TQkrDhSRZh8a8jdq4VFddkw7a05nByh6t ifwpIEJh6cqdJ2xWWRkEIqDyad9JnBubgczabEomS4xlHg5Qfzj8wkAX6SyicYG0kESs wN2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxMoHNhwXQrVSjNvR/HQebhLGvQ9rOfIvOQhRebUo3n1O5VEAdl OVbRWMGyr0c/EZSI0qqGhpUwbHsMc6kT0LqvyEJBki1h5wezWaGV6qjEZtdDFXRC X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OEOrm9JAhjU23o/BFI4kD9YqOG32XCH8xVDtfcYYpw8sXwnqPXmhZyz28QDH25 luDQqQWt94fUSPJz46AIpGA5zPQUzKgfnyu/X4txh6U4ECRXbGxfmm7PQ6CXzgRE0ygO+d1ws9g j1Fgo4+79ORrn7PDS/+V41ximcMYsH9rHFe95R3nJ2U8gf2AF0eXoWhcCcycHswCNfaNCkFlKRI P1b9YJ3sYlv2MtNlSItgkfXtlKkLWWTJvRjPb5huiV/71NL6LD30OS0Ew9SBYZzMe6Hp2ZU2zGo /anATYmvgXlSacc/jeOuoY2BWU61HeZwLTvB4ZNknTiDBtdcAWEo+MXy9L7gndWmpMPchqddVGu 2fkh4lj0ep3e40QAuTHVITzPsuuw3wUyTtEBsu/NjbIQeUcDz9tOkQSBy74iC2iJfTNi4ZqAHxn YTmoH8kKpQdAFTlwtjvdt2wHU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c943:b0:2c6:af4b:99a1 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2c6af4b9fa3mr404925ad.3.1781607686842; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fedora ([103.51.149.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2c42f2e52a9sm132561995ad.11.2026.06.16.04.01.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:01:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Subhrojyoti Bala To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subhrojyoti Bala Subject: [PATCH 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix multi-line comment style in rtw_mlme.h Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:30:47 +0530 Message-ID: <20260616110048.45541-5-subhrojyoti0609@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260616110048.45541-1-subhrojyoti0609@gmail.com> References: <20260616110048.45541-1-subhrojyoti0609@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Block comment was not using * on subsequent lines and had blank lines inside the comment body. Fix it to comply with kernel coding style. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Subhrojyoti Bala --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h | 33 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h index dbb523c8a58b..59b12d9daa71 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h @@ -67,23 +67,22 @@ enum { }; /* - -there are several "locks" in mlme_priv, -since mlme_priv is a shared resource between many threads, -like ISR/Call-Back functions, the OID handlers, and even timer functions. - -Each struct __queue has its own locks, already. -Other items in mlme_priv are protected by mlme_priv.lock, while items in -xmit_priv are protected by xmit_priv.lock. - -To avoid possible dead lock, any thread trying to modifying mlme_priv -SHALL not lock up more than one locks at a time! - -The only exception is that queue functions which take the __queue.lock -may be called with the xmit_priv.lock held. In this case the order -MUST always be first lock xmit_priv.lock and then call any queue functions -which take __queue.lock. -*/ + * There are several "locks" in mlme_priv, + * since mlme_priv is a shared resource between many threads, + * like ISR/Call-Back functions, the OID handlers, and even timer functions. + * + * Each struct __queue has its own locks, already. + * Other items in mlme_priv are protected by mlme_priv.lock, while items in + * xmit_priv are protected by xmit_priv.lock. + * + * To avoid possible dead lock, any thread trying to modifying mlme_priv + * SHALL not lock up more than one locks at a time! + * + * The only exception is that queue functions which take the __queue.lock + * may be called with the xmit_priv.lock held. In this case the order + * MUST always be first lock xmit_priv.lock and then call any queue functions + * which take __queue.lock. + */ struct sitesurvey_ctrl { u64 last_tx_pkts; -- 2.54.0