From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1F43A961B; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 20:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786910947; cv=none; b=rkodD/Bbo28HmShyn8OLmnvBaHcoQXmG754slxDXepXgmgzH2bxnxJWepkIZpjVmApUlZaJeDMWBjcruvyKbNiYa1mqitfBe7FoU4+ejdm4uw3lT3ROAe8Xk1EpE0Tn2RyZgx64PNf2wDdAqvpTsoZXlRt3FYA2IZw9FUOl8nTo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786910947; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1RUqESLfyCLnumX0L0JtUcgmewXJXFBDnmm9hudNrwE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ba89OsjEDa5M91jRTMCfEBJbzD5wIjnAOOjdLSaw9qwCe+nwwfeYuhUfs09cpQVjFFfLCZrFTmCYAb2IJkk+om3O948bbDUVaYj/SUbDJelbpDyUMq5npVdOQY9izy683kEChwAgtPhAaCLH7bTCoDbrHld8pDnc/I6hLOlZclU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZBE1SzUr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZBE1SzUr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 721161F000E9; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 20:09:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786910946; bh=rncw3Mh1vYWtXSr8o1BuEq34sysukRkoilNd+fF7fOY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ZBE1SzUray38dMIWAqFmHI+pd9sjMHIgmwI/tFxjiYxC0+TopX/Tdzs+eK4j8uKU/ 41CnCrBkiBFNst5XwAPyoVgYiN7A0xkreLKb4zLq1W3Td4mnLO/YRsENIDLbcytFvm ZiOCjZZLqSYETH7mmJHbjjIANnqHrXfSTQtPLPsfTD7OwmKVaky9lFHEdHNsCj1w6h 68osRf3OvESPAr9/MS1oX2u2eV+LybuH4CwkZo+GDyKRAelzuDITpnX4n6uXsXWqxH WcJUKIeaXHi5ZsyRbIAJP+I8cUz1Y+f6kvZStxVJIPzqZX2z/ux8acGHWiDBA2kuUv EqM7jLRyC1nuQ== Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 21:09:01 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Mohamad Raizudeen , dlechner@baylibre.com, andy@kernel.org, nuno.sa@analog.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joshua.crofts1@gmail.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, me@brighamcampbell.com, jkoolstra@xs4all.nl, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: iio: frequency: ad9832/ad9834: add comment explaining do_div usage Message-ID: <20260816210901.55959c11@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260807094704.5371-1-raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 23:12:37 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 03:17:03PM +0530, Mohamad Raizudeen wrote: > > Previous attempts to change do_div() to div64_ul were rejected because > > mclk will always fit within 32 fits for this hardware, making do_div() > > safe to use. > > > > However, Coccinelle continues to flag this as a false positive. To > > prevent future developers from submitting unnecessary fixes, add a > > comment explaining why do_div() is intentionally kept. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Applied to the testing branch of iio.git. That will become togreg and turn up in linux-next after I rebase on rc1 (in a few weeks time) Thanks, Jonathan