From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com (mail-wr1-f45.google.com [209.85.221.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2527B; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 07:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id m30so32333415wrb.1; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kSVb1dTbWdbne8U6VvmE51Q2krf82Epq6ExE1DUNwlY=; b=DWwExqt6wOKpB5leH0YrszfY4BBOcAmwKWK3k3xC8z8e3PXmH2PV8rw7gkliIKYfYT YGcBgvBEmCwLigZ8CW8xgyRn+gx82i8csj/m8AzVx9MonCoVLLvo8bCJwMzEiS496oft GvpunYLmNbKAs8mZL4KSAxIJZvc/3srBuPY+/2Q8kOIolZ91IWFOg0Bq8qSPL6AmJKTo W/TBtzfmNxYjQAvzlw8mEEc4phADplW4qxzOFr7V6DxqNobma2+MH61VJSbUqzMNGEGV B048JowqMWFaHg0uup350luMdndFk+UtyJxvESamR7b0WLTDnWkc5Cy9tfFc+ovLDIcN NZiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kSVb1dTbWdbne8U6VvmE51Q2krf82Epq6ExE1DUNwlY=; b=kUP6OLMNYaWN+Ykq0ySphkWDwz8AokunA2RyWXnj3ceeP8yrhzTztufJqUag4eaLjd ZNpPoh1HqX05b/JBeZ67fiZ6WecoyIvkkbmK5QikJoa6/n+4eUJ4TUwLn1Nzm+ckAHrI r5fXNNiU34LuE7c8w8Lhg5ATZKzw580pazur0gP+8TsfK8hufFQibMkNFphfQebmDNpI EG2P4kvKV/79Xuvea9Cy8+puz92+8xwu603fNVj3BAjyuHac1CD/g3dqp5wL1vm8u8dH jwOwL3Pdn8s+5aWO0dLRnR+yXqVwatTRKeKEuOvAPc/Vy+UnXo/5mJs1ue96UUkabrW8 VXdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iHL6KKphC23OyoQ/watmNiz/iFRUorsTEn993GTxs/jpuhZAR +YHZcIc9YgcBzwVHLjihNqo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVQ+8U4h+ZzHr7EWX8iqE5z6jQcrTABOrQQenrmyRHHZPiTBRsumyMbVJb1jBTKWKM7T0Y2A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f102:0:b0:205:7d05:d250 with SMTP id r2-20020adff102000000b002057d05d250mr2943236wro.350.1648710063300; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leap.localnet (host-95-249-145-232.retail.telecomitalia.it. [95.249.145.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15-20020a05600c1c0f00b0038cabc63721sm6875058wms.30.2022.03.31.00.01.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:01:02 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , sparmaintainer@unisys.com Cc: David Kershner , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev, Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: Remove "struct dentry *eth_debugfs_dir" Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:00:59 +0200 Message-ID: <2098282.irdbgypaU6@leap> In-Reply-To: <20220331064751.29634-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> References: <20220331064751.29634-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" On gioved=EC 31 marzo 2022 08:47:51 CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > There is no need for "struct dentry *eth_debugfs_dir" which is used for > debug / sysfs directories. Therefore, remove this "struct dentry" and > everything related (i.e., creation and removal). >=20 > As a side effect of this change, the code has no more need of the > "cleanup_register_netdev" label, which can also be removed. >=20 > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter > Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco > --- >=20 > v1 - v2: Add a couple of "Suggested-by" tags which were forgotten.=20 > Thanks to Dan Carpenter and Greg Kroah-Hartman. >=20 > drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c | 17 ----------------- > 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-) As said some days ago, the email address of David Kershner at unisys.com is not anymore reachable. Each time I submit patches for this Unisys'=20 driver I get the following message: Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: David Kershner (david.kershner at unisys.com) The email address you entered couldn't be found.=20 Please check the recipient's email address and try to resend the message. Is it the case to remove his entry from the MAINTAINERS file? I'm asking because I don't yet know how these kinds of issues are handled.=20 Any suggestions? Thanks, =46abio M. De Francesco