From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, phil@philpotter.co.uk,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] staging: r8188eu: fix missing unlock in rtw_resume()
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:40:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2746511.UyKHOQf6m0@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211028094038.2877341-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
On Thursday, October 28, 2021 11:40:38 AM CEST Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Add the missing unlock before return from rtw_resume().
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Fixes: 2b42bd58b321 ("staging: r8188eu: introduce new os_dep dir for
RTL8188eu driver")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c b/drivers/staging/
r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> index 6b93830130e7..5a35d9fe3fc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> @@ -298,8 +298,10 @@ static int rtw_resume(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf)
> pwrpriv->bkeepfwalive = false;
>
> DBG_88E("bkeepfwalive(%x)\n", pwrpriv->bkeepfwalive);
> - if (pm_netdev_open(pnetdev, true) != 0)
> + if (pm_netdev_open(pnetdev, true) != 0) {
> + mutex_unlock(&pwrpriv->lock);
> goto exit;
> + }
>
> netif_device_attach(pnetdev);
> netif_carrier_on(pnetdev);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Good catch, well done!
I recently replaced semaphores with mutexes in this and other r8188eu driver
functions (commit 7e4c7947b42c "staging: r8188eu: Use a Mutex instead of a
binary semaphore") but, while making those changes, I didn't notice that the
'if' in rtw_resume () can lead to a jump to the "exit" label without properly
unlocking the "pwrpriv-> lock" mutex.
Acked-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Thank you,
Fabio
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-28 9:40 [PATCH -next] staging: r8188eu: fix missing unlock in rtw_resume() Yang Yingliang
2021-10-28 10:40 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2746511.UyKHOQf6m0@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox