From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0FF3FC3 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 10:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id q26so6379172wrc.7 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:24:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YqGDZZMJKPugLbHU1Z+KSXD5nBkqoBERs7vHAT2/hzo=; b=Q3l5j9tTDRzH0acAC7NMkA87vTfP4ro0ABYJMQakGilztDnr3CkxusgQKX7HvQNAXT DVza84wZe+jYqKzSiq0mU+89Q0RbjbmGKF5Y5iOtRqMeJ0KeGimOUI3oZb0JKyNWa1Q2 rMWintNWJy243GdKTPUdn5PykLQqmvGqB3RgP5ar0wqlqTm9iLH0wa8D3uE0227MTDdj DGvDGamsp+WH9QzV7HweU+X3u+K1hk6yRX4S42LExH3rnE6qvs5k23wZJRlp7q4/YsNq Es6YtM0pc/0s20yv5ITHqCFwZ08O79zHLaDlWVueM/s8YN+jaQ1d9wP4f3hvtIMgiem5 PqaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YqGDZZMJKPugLbHU1Z+KSXD5nBkqoBERs7vHAT2/hzo=; b=tdAgD3RYqmvaDCQx+lig9mCchWoxhpMLLISoNwvyA3457nFSWvvtNZlkgvQc4sJ8Qj tarsnKds9R++UmxSVLxtP85PyTbliXvId6tkMO6uvm0z48saLfAGrNB7jg+nQPEToab3 Xkcj8THgSfeti0wUBSdtojlP3m1JUeQMynIEtUuJaKUCI414oehRfjHAwWjATGByUl++ +tATNfZJ209zjRQPVWzY4zPWjKH/4z1D4QbTRgkIut+vh7bcbT0Lns2jdp008K8itGF/ egu7YJfliTCIZFcrICQjXDxvGx23fWSTNSkslZMuxkOg6qUwqXWaMNymX2wb4I9eXTdU j1rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Jcac24QaioXpBC0SNgOvIOOMnJJrPAoJBxRmYlvqrWasiOk7f zP51ylWQ3VGb+WNt4xQW1TM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWawzrPoeggbJueCiuR65y3mZN0kFClQFojNFf0Y5ecIXX1lCT5YBC2k4SQ3hHh7qDvMGKPQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ee49:: with SMTP id w9mr2476358wro.158.1631355850945; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8108:96c0:3b88::8fe1? ([2a02:8108:96c0:3b88::8fe1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2sm1213238wmj.29.2021.09.11.03.24.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <296aa357-1bba-4136-c651-a18d04c8d32a@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:24:09 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] remove pointers from struct hal_ops Content-Language: en-US To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, phil@philpotter.co.uk, martin@kaiser.cx, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210910205033.3778-1-straube.linux@gmail.com> <1858319.rr7sHpn3up@localhost.localdomain> From: Michael Straube In-Reply-To: <1858319.rr7sHpn3up@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/11/21 11:38, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > On Friday, September 10, 2021 10:50:26 PM CEST Michael Straube wrote: >> This series removes some more pointers from struct hal_ops and >> removes the function rtl8188e_set_hal_ops() that is empty after >> the removals. >> >> Michael Straube (7): >> staging: r8188eu: remove mgnt_xmit from struct hal_ops >> staging: r8188eu: remove hal_xmit from struct hal_ops >> staging: r8188eu: remove read_bbreg from struct hal_ops >> staging: r8188eu: remove write_bbreg from struct hal_ops >> staging: r8188eu: remove read_rfreg from struct hal_ops >> staging: r8188eu: remove write_rfreg from struct hal_ops >> staging: r8188eu: remove rtl8188e_set_hal_ops() >> > > Hi Michael, > > This series is good. > > Furthermore, I compiled the whole series with gcc version 11.2.1 2020816 > [revision 056e324ce46a7924b5cf10f61010cf9dd2ca10e9] (SUSE Linux) one > patch at a time. There are no errors or warnings at any time in any of the > seven builds. > > But, unfortunately, I have no time to test. So the whole series is... > > Acked-by: Fabio M. De Francesco > > Thanks, > > Fabio > Hi Fabio, thank you for the review. I have tested it on x86_64 with Inter-Tech DMG-02 connected to a CCMP network without any issues. Perhaps I should have mentioned that in the cover letter. ;) Thanks, Michael