From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com>,
Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, lars@metafoo.de,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adt7316: replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit()
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:18:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34a55901fe0729145097d287a98746f23eea13d8.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116152800.4c1849cc@jic23-huawei>
On Sun, 2025-11-16 at 15:28 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2025 13:08:07 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 12:16 PM Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Convert several sprintf() calls to sysfs_emit() in the
> > > sysfs show functions, as it is the preferred helper and
> > > prevents potential buffer overruns.
> > >
> > > No functional changes intended.
> >
> > I briefly looked at it and see no issues,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
> >
>
> Applied, but I will note that this driver is a long way from suitable
> for moving out of staging and I would be surprised if more than
> one or two of the lines changed in this patch make it through the
> necessary refactors (should anyone actually have another go at
> doing them). Anyhow, I still think this is worth taking just to
> reduce the noise of remaining instances of this.
>
> I'd have deleted this long ago except I actually have one somewhere
> and it one of the supported parts was still listed as suitable for
> new designs when I checked not long ago.
Seems to be now "just" in production. So no longer advised for new designs. I gave a
quick look and this is far from being a simple driver. It would require a fair amount
of work to bring it out of staging. So, are there users relying on staging drivers?
But I would assume that for staging we are still free to drop support it?
>
> ADI folk, I would like to hear if we should just delete this one.
I guess Michael is the best person to answer this question.
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 10:16 [PATCH] staging: iio: adt7316: replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() Shi Hao
2025-11-16 11:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-16 15:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-18 8:18 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-11-18 12:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-19 14:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 16:51 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-12-02 13:55 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34a55901fe0729145097d287a98746f23eea13d8.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i.shihao.999@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).