From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: Andrei Khomenkov <khomenkov@mailbox.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: cleanup code and style
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3831D599-655E-40B2-9E5D-9DF956013088@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330184640.17795-1-khomenkov@mailbox.org>
On March 30, 2026 8:46:37 PM GMT+02:00, Andrei Khomenkov <khomenkov@mailbox.org> wrote:
>This series of patches cleans up the rtl8723bs driver code to improve
>readability and better align with the Linux kernel coding style.
>The first patch simplifies boolean comparisons, while the second one
>performs general code cleanup.
>
>Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20260325110143.35466-1-khomenkov@mailbox.org/
>
>v2:
> - Split the single patch into a two-patch series to separate
> logical changes, as suggested by Luka Gejak.
> - Cleaned up additional boolean comparisons found using 'git grep'.
>
>Andrei Khomenkov (2):
> staging: rtl8723bs: simplify boolean comparisons
> staging: rtl8723bs: cleanup code style and parentheses
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_btcoex.c | 4 +-
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 2 +-
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c | 50 ++++++-------
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 18 ++---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 16 ++---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 72 +++++++++----------
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 2 +-
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c | 18 ++---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 37 +++++-----
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 10 +--
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c | 4 +-
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_intf.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.c | 8 +--
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_CfoTracking.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_DIG.c | 32 ++++-----
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_cmd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c | 10 +--
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_hal_init.c | 13 ++--
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_recv.c | 2 +-
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723bs_xmit.c | 6 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c | 6 +-
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 51 ++++++-------
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/sdio_ops_linux.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/xmit_linux.c | 13 ++--
> 26 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
>
Hi Andrei and Greg,
I am retracting my previous Reviewed-by tag.
As Greg pointed out, I reviewed this too hastily. This patch
improperly mixes cosmetic style cleanups with functional logic changes
regarding the bitwise check_fwstate() evaluations. Furthermore, it
introduces a syntax error (unbalanced parentheses) around line 782 in
core/rtw_xmit.c that breaks the build.
Andrei, you will need to split this into a proper patch series:
1. Separate the functional bug fixes (the check_fwstate logic) from
the pure style cleanups.
2. Group fixes of same kind by directory (e.g. core/, os_dep/) to keep
the patches manageable. For example simplify boolean comparisons in
core directory.
Apologies for the noise.
Best regards,
Luka Gejak
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 18:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: cleanup code and style Andrei Khomenkov
2026-03-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: simplify boolean comparisons Andrei Khomenkov
2026-03-31 22:13 ` Ethan Tidmore
2026-04-01 8:18 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-03-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: cleanup code style and parentheses Andrei Khomenkov
2026-03-31 8:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-01 8:22 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-03-30 20:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: cleanup code and style Luka Gejak
2026-03-31 11:06 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3831D599-655E-40B2-9E5D-9DF956013088@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khomenkov@mailbox.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox