[PATCH 15/16] staging: gpib: tms9914: fixes multiline comments style

Paul Retourné
2025-04-12T18:19:02Z

drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c
index 2abda9d7dfcb..edbd8ea8967c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/tms9914/tms9914.c
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ int tms9914_take_control(struct gpib_board *board, struct tms9914_priv *priv, in
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tms9914_take_control);

-/* The agilent 82350B has a buggy implementation of tcs which interferes with the
+/*
+ * The agilent 82350B has a buggy implementation of tcs which interferes with the
* operation of tca. It appears to be based on the controller state machine
* described in the TI 9900 TMS9914A data manual published in 1982. This
* manual describes tcs as putting the controller into a CWAS
@@ -321,7 +322,8 @@ static void update_talker_state(struct tms9914_priv *priv, unsigned int address_
if (address_status_bits & HR_ATN)
priv->talker_state = talker_addressed;
else
- /* this could also be serial_poll_active, but the tms9914 provides no
+ /*
+ * this could also be serial_poll_active, but the tms9914 provides no
* way to distinguish, so we'll assume talker_active
*/
priv->talker_state = talker_active;
@@ -738,7 +740,8 @@ irqreturn_t tms9914_interrupt_have_status(struct gpib_board *board, struct tms99
switch (command_byte) {
case PPConfig:
priv->ppoll_configure_state = 1;
- /* AUX_PTS generates another UNC interrupt on the next command byte
+ /*
+ * AUX_PTS generates another UNC interrupt on the next command byte
* if it is in the secondary address group (such as PPE and PPD).
*/
write_byte(priv, AUX_PTS, AUXCR);
--
2.49.0