From: Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org>
To: Panagiotis Petrakopoulos <npetrakopoulos2003@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix missing shared-key auth challenge length check
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 11:46:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39a61cc710b34ffbfecbbddfadeb8b4d8352a7f5.camel@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708084342.136878-1-npetrakopoulos2003@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2026-07-08 at 11:43 +0300, Panagiotis Petrakopoulos wrote:
> The WEP shared-key authentication handlers use the challenge-text
> element's attacker-controlled length without checking it against the
> fixed 128-byte chg_txt buffer.
Plenty long and complex sentence. It took me a couple minutes to
understand (or misunderstand). Please split into a couple sentences.
That's my try in rewording (is it possible to drop 'shared key'?):
The WEP shared key authentication handlers use the challenge-text
element's length. This text and it's lenght are attacker-controlled.
The handler does not check the lenght against the fixed 128-byte
chg_txt buffer.
> In OnAuthClient() the length from rtw_get_ie() - up to 255 - is used
> to perform memcpy() into the 128-byte pmlmeinfo->chg_txt, so a
> malicious AP sending a malformed WLAN_EID_CHALLENGE element can
> overflow/underfill chg_txt by up to 127 bytes.
Again, but this one isn't as bad.
> It is reachable over the
> air, before association, during shared-key authentication. In the case
> of an overflow, the driver can write out of bounds. In the case of an
> underfill, the driver can echo stale buffer memory. In OnAuth() a
> similar issue is observed. The driver compares a full 128 bytes
> regardless of the element's length, reading past a shorter element.
>
> The challenge text is defined to be exactly 128 octets, which is
> already provided as the WLAN_AUTH_CHALLENGE_LEN define; require the
> element to be exactly that length in both handlers.
This is good.
> Fixes: 554c0a3abf21 ("staging: Add rtl8723bs sdio wifi driver")
I added the mentioned people in the commit to cc.
Thanks and
Reviewed-by: Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Panagiotis Petrakopoulos <npetrakopoulos2003@gmail.com>
> ---
> Compile-tested only; I do not have RTL8723BS hardware to test the
> shared-key authentication path at runtime. The change only rejects
> challenge elements whose length differs from the spec-mandated 128
> bytes, so conforming peers are unaffected.
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index a86d6f97cf02..13634d4e83d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ unsigned int OnAuth(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame
> *precv_frame)
> p = rtw_get_ie(pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + 4 + _AUTH_IE_OFFSET_,
> WLAN_EID_CHALLENGE, (int *)&ie_len,
> len - WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN - _AUTH_IE_OFFSET_ - 4);
>
> - if (!p || ie_len <= 0) {
> + if (!p || ie_len != WLAN_AUTH_CHALLENGE_LEN) {
> status = WLAN_STATUS_CHALLENGE_FAIL;
> goto auth_fail;
> }
> @@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ unsigned int OnAuthClient(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame
> *precv_fram
> p = rtw_get_ie(pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + _AUTH_IE_OFFSET_,
> WLAN_EID_CHALLENGE, (int *)&len,
> pkt_len - WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN - _AUTH_IE_OFFSET_);
>
> - if (!p)
> + if (!p || len != WLAN_AUTH_CHALLENGE_LEN)
> goto authclnt_fail;
>
> memcpy(pmlmeinfo->chg_txt, p + 2, len);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 8:43 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix missing shared-key auth challenge length check Panagiotis Petrakopoulos
2026-07-08 9:46 ` Manuel Ebner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39a61cc710b34ffbfecbbddfadeb8b4d8352a7f5.camel@mailbox.org \
--to=manuelebner@mailbox.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=npetrakopoulos2003@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox