From: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Kushal Kothari <kushalkothari285@gmail.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, fabioaiuto83@gmail.com,
ross.schm.dev@gmail.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
marcocesati@gmail.com, fmdefrancesco@gmail.com,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, mike.rapoport@gmail.com,
kushalkothari2850@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Refactor nested if-else
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:43:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4715e602-bdc0-e0d9-ff99-8eb08c8c5063@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025072528.152028-1-kushalkothari285@gmail.com>
On 25-10-2021 12:55, Kushal Kothari wrote:
> Refactor nested if else by combining nested if into a single if condition and removing unnecessary else conditionals which leads to removing unnecessary tabs .There is no change in logic of new code.
> checkpatch warning : Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
>
> Signed-off-by: Kushal Kothari <kushalkothari285@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 65 ++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index 0f82f5031c43..eb10b6f85426 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -1192,46 +1192,33 @@ unsigned int OnAssocReq(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame)
> p = pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + ie_offset; ie_len = 0;
> for (;;) {
> p = rtw_get_ie(p, WLAN_EID_VENDOR_SPECIFIC, &ie_len, pkt_len - WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN - ie_offset);
> - if (p) {
> - if (!memcmp(p+2, WMM_IE, 6)) {
> -
> - pstat->flags |= WLAN_STA_WME;
> -
> - pstat->qos_option = 1;
> - pstat->qos_info = *(p+8);
> -
> - pstat->max_sp_len = (pstat->qos_info>>5)&0x3;
> -
> - if ((pstat->qos_info&0xf) != 0xf)
> - pstat->has_legacy_ac = true;
> - else
> - pstat->has_legacy_ac = false;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&0xf) {
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(0))
> - pstat->uapsd_vo = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_vo = 0;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(1))
> - pstat->uapsd_vi = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_vi = 0;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(2))
> - pstat->uapsd_bk = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_bk = 0;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(3))
> - pstat->uapsd_be = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_be = 0;
> -
> - }
> -
> - break;
> + if (p && !memcmp(p+2, WMM_IE, 6)) {
> + pstat->flags |= WLAN_STA_WME;
> + pstat->qos_option = 1;
> + pstat->qos_info = *(p+8);
> + pstat->max_sp_len = (pstat->qos_info>>5)&0x3;
> + pstat->has_legacy_ac = false;
> + if ((pstat->qos_info&0xf) != 0xf)
> + pstat->has_legacy_ac = true;
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_vo = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&0xf) {
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(0))
> + pstat->uapsd_vo = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_vi = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(1))
> + pstat->uapsd_vi = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_bk = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(2))
> + pstat->uapsd_bk = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_be = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(3))
> + pstat->uapsd_be = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> }
> + break;
> } else {
> break;
> }
there is a bug here, if *p* is not null, and *memcmp* failed; then we fall in else part and break, and will miss the next entry in *p* using below statement
p = p + ie_len + 2;
>
Regards,
~Praveen.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 7:25 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Refactor nested if-else Kushal Kothari
2021-10-25 7:33 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <CALtHPQsQe06MhSvgs25TVbsjEvfU=ELbK3eFfKunRHXM1+HDxA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-10-25 10:02 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-10-25 9:13 ` Praveen Kumar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4715e602-bdc0-e0d9-ff99-8eb08c8c5063@gmail.com \
--to=kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=kushalkothari2850@gmail.com \
--cc=kushalkothari285@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=marcocesati@gmail.com \
--cc=mike.rapoport@gmail.com \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=ross.schm.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox