From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
To: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
outreachy@lists.linux.dev, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: modify struct field to use standard bool type
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 07:06:52 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c35ae41-c834-e25a-ccab-5cdd34aa4680@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z+05IEjV3pczMLNQ@HP-650>
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Abraham Samuel Adekunle wrote:
> The struct field uses the uint values 0 and 1 to represent false and
> true values respectively.
>
> Convert cases to use the bool type instead to conform to Linux
> coding styles and ensure consistency.
This is vague. Ensure consistency with what? You can point out that true
or false was already being used elsewhere in the code.
>
> reported by Coccinelle:
>
> Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> index ed6942e289a5..82f54f769ed1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ void update_bmc_sta(struct adapter *padapter)
> psta->qos_option = 0;
> psta->htpriv.ht_option = false;
>
> - psta->ieee8021x_blocked = 0;
> + psta->ieee8021x_blocked = false;
>
> memset((void *)&psta->sta_stats, 0, sizeof(struct stainfo_stats));
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h
> index b3535fed3de7..63343998266a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct sta_info {
> uint qos_option;
> u8 hwaddr[ETH_ALEN];
>
> - uint ieee8021x_blocked; /* 0: allowed, 1:blocked */
> + bool ieee8021x_blocked;
This declaration doesn't have the same alignment as the others.
You should also check whether this is a structure that is read from the
hardware. In that case, it would be a concern if the bool field does not
have the same size as the uint one.
julia
> uint dot118021XPrivacy; /* aes, tkip... */
> union Keytype dot11tkiptxmickey;
> union Keytype dot11tkiprxmickey;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 13:18 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: modify struct field to use standard bool type Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2025-04-03 5:06 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2025-04-03 7:09 ` Samuel Abraham
2025-04-03 9:33 ` Samuel Abraham
2025-04-03 13:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-03 14:02 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-04-03 14:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c35ae41-c834-e25a-ccab-5cdd34aa4680@inria.fr \
--to=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox